[health-vn] System Set Up After SARS Epidemic Was Slow to Alert Global Authorities
vern.weitzel at gmail.com
Fri May 1 15:05:01 EST 2009
System Set Up After SARS Epidemic Was Slow to Alert Global Authorities
By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Despite huge efforts in the past six years to make the reporting of disease
outbreaks fast and automatic, there were significant delays in bringing Mexico's
swine flu outbreak to the full attention of international authorities.
News of an outbreak of severe respiratory illness in Mexico burst into public
consciousness last Friday, April 24.
That was 18 days after public health authorities there started looking into
unusual cases of pneumonia in their country, eight days after Mexican
authorities notified the World Health Organization of the growing outbreak and
four days after the events came to the full attention of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta.
Officials involved in pandemic preparedness at the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, which oversees the CDC, did not learn of the Mexican outbreak
until the day the rest of the world did, April 24. They did know, however, that
the CDC was investigating six rare cases of swine influenza in California and Texas.
As Mexican health authorities were finding cases of unusual illness, they at
least once officially notified the WHO's regional office in Washington, the Pan
American Health Organization (PAHO), of a possibly brewing epidemic. People in
the WHO's Geneva headquarters also received several urgent warnings from a
biosurveillance firm, Veratect, based in Kirkland, Wash.
The delay in making the global health community aware happened despite the
adoption in 2005 of international health regulations requiring nations to report
to the WHO within 24 hours any disease outbreak that is serious, unusual, at
risk of spreading internationally or potentially disruptive of trade. By the
time international authorities became fully aware of the outbreak, there were
about 800 cases and at least 50 deaths, and the virus was unknowingly being
carried into other countries.
What seems apparent is that the world health community's newly rebuilt,
well-oiled -- but never used -- mechanism for warning the world about pandemics
may have given nations far less lead time than intended.
"After all this work on flu surveillance and setting up a reporting system and
then this -- perhaps this isn't the best example of how it's supposed to work,"
said a highly placed health official in the Obama administration who was not
authorized to speak on the record.
After the balky start, however, the WHO's pandemic response system is running well.
Teams of epidemiologists overseen by the WHO (but staffed mostly by Mexican,
American and Canadian scientists) are in Mexico investigating the outbreak. The
WHO's emergency committee of independent experts has met to evaluate the data.
On its advice, Margaret Chan, the WHO's director general, raised the global
pandemic alert level from phase 3 to phase 4, and yesterday to phase 5.
"Now things seem to be proceeding swimmingly," said a different high-level
health official in the administration, also not authorized to speak by name.
The swine flu epidemic is the first test of the revised International Health
Regulations, which were passed by the WHO's 193 member countries in 2005 and
took effect June 15, 2007.
The regulations descend from the First International Sanitary Conference, held
in Paris in 1851 to fight cholera. In content, they owe much to the severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic of 2003.
That infection, also caused by a virus, emerged in China in November 2002 and
spread to 29 countries before being stamped out the following July. In all,
there were 8,437 probable cases and 813 deaths, for a "case fatality rate" of
In the early, crucial weeks, Chinese authorities played down the number of
cases, did not report them promptly to the WHO and moved patients into closed
military hospitals to escape discovery. Only when the deception was revealed and
the country's health minister ousted was SARS brought under control.
It is under those revised International Health Regulations that countries must
report the four categories of diseases, including new subtypes of influenza, to
the WHO, as well as any other "public health emergency of international concern."
The full account of the Mexican events will take months to reconstruct. Requests
made over the past five days to WHO spokesmen for a rough chronology of events
and interviews with experts have not been answered. Similar requests to the CDC
have been turned down.
CDC spokesman Tom Skinner said yesterday: "We are working on a very thorough
timeline that we will make available . . . when it's ready. . . . Now is simply
not the time for us to be sidetracked from what we need to do right now to
protect public health."
Mexican health authorities appear to have become concerned about unusual events
on April 6, after 400 people sought medical care for pneumonia or a flulike
illness in the previous week in La Gloria, in Veracruz state, according to Veratect.
On that day, the company, which provides information to industry,
nongovernmental organizations and governments for a fee, sent an alert to its
clients titled: "La Gloria: 'Strange' Respiratory Affects 60% of Local
Population; Three Pediatric Deaths May be Associated with the Outbreak."
Both the CDC and PAHO have free subscriptions to Veratect's postings. The firm's
servers show that an epidemiologist at PAHO looked at the message about the La
Gloria events on April 10 and again on April 11, the company's president, Robert
Hart, said yesterday.
Veratect sent another alert 10 days later, on April 16, titled "Atypical
Pneumonia Cases Reported at Hospital" about severe illnesses in Oaxaca.
One of those cases appears to have been in a 39-year-old woman, whose death from
"severe pneumonia with no clear explanation" triggered an investigation at the
national level, Mauricio Hernández-Ávila, Mexico's deputy health minister for
disease prevention, said in an interview last week.
That same day, Mexican authorities notified PAHO of a worrisome outbreak of
Asked how PAHO could have learned of Mexico's investigation on April 16 but the
WHO not announce the spreading epidemic until April 24, Hernández-Ávila said:
"PAHO for some reason did not report. That is the fly in the soup. It looks as
if we did something wrong, but we did not."
PAHO spokesman Daniel Epstein confirmed this week that the agency's recipient of
disease alerts got a message from Mexican authorities April 16 about an unusual
disease outbreak. He said it is impossible that authorities in Geneva did not
learn of it at the same time, as the system sends messages through to WHO
In any case, Veratect's chief scientist, a physician named James M. Wilson, said
he sent its April 16 posting directly to the WHO's Global Outbreak Alert and
Response Network because he was so alarmed.
He sent it again April 17, he said yesterday. On April 21, he requested by
e-mail that two outbreak specialists at the WHO acknowledge that they had gotten
the messages and were aware of the Mexican outbreak. They replied the next day
that they were.
Wilson said that in the meantime, on April 20, he called the CDC's emergency
operations center in Atlanta and talked with a physician on duty for the global
disease detection team. He knew they were investigating swine flu cases in
California and Texas.
"I said something like, 'We realize you guys are probably really busy. But the
situation in Mexico has gotten to the point where you simply must take a look.
And you need to do it now,' " he recalled.
They talked at length, and the CDC physician "indicated that they were not
aware" of the problem, Wilson said. The CDC physician later called back and said
he "had done some checking and that there was some chatter in the system" about
Mexican events, Wilson recalled.
"CDC did not blow us off. After that conversation, they were right on it," he said.
Vern Weitzel (Mr.) BSc, BA, MA, M Env Man & Dev
<vern at coombs.anu.edu.au> <vern.weitzel at gmail.com> <vernweitzel at mac.com>
ANU/AVSL eMail Lists: http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~vern/forum.html
NGO Centre eMail Lists: http://ngocentre.org.vn/mailman/listinfo
Address during 2009: 2724 NE 24th St, Renton WA 98056 USA
phone/fax: +1 (425) 228-4513 Mobile: +1 (206) 3-9999-81
Ha Noi address: 1st stairwell, apartment 504-505, block A4 Giang Vo,
Ba Dinh, Ha Noi [off Ngoc Khanh Street, opposite Van Phuc Compound]
home phone: +84 4 3846-1751 Skype: vernweitzel
IF I DO NOT RESPOND IN A REASONABLE TIME, PLEASE RESEND YOUR MESSAGE
Kindness heals the wounds of a lifetime.
More information about the health-vn