DNS: April 4th ADNA meeting

Tony Barry Tony.Barry@anu.edu.au
Thu, 20 Mar 1997 17:20:27 +1100


At 3:23 PM 20/3/97, Stewart Carter wrote:
>If the ADNA is supposed to be principally a regulatory body, with licensing
>powers deciding who will, and who will not be a DNA, surely it would be
>inappropriate for DNA's or their employees or representatives to be on the
>board?
>
>Wouldn't it be better to have the DNA's as the constituent members of ADNA,
>and governed and managed by a board of individuals and/or organisations which,
>by definition, have no commercial interest in any individual DNA?

How can you have this without legislation? A Commonwealth Statutory body
with a Board appointed by the government of the day with or without its
determinations overturnable by the Senate. Hmm...

Tony

______________________________________________
Email    : Tony.Barry@anu.edu.au
Voice    : +61 6 249 5688 (ANU)    +61 6 288 0959 (Home)
Details  : http://www.anu.edu.au/CNASI/People/TonyB.html
Mail     : GPO Box 1680, Canberra City, ACT 2601

Visiting Fellow,   Department of Computer Science
Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
The Australian National University     Canberra  ACT  0200 AUSTRALIA
Computing and Information Sciences Building, Room 242

Join the Internet Society of Australia! http://www.isoc-au.org.au