NOT SO - Huge Security holes in MS FrontPage 98
Robin M. Stephens
robinst@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU
Wed, 22 Oct 1997 20:26:27 +1000 (AEST)
On Wed, 22 Oct 1997, Ed Parsons wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> To address a blatantly flawed argument I'll put in my 2 cents worth.
>
> At 12:42 AM 22-10-97 -0700, Tony Wilkinson wrote:
>
> >As for NT Server and its ability to function reliably, IDC confirmed
> >that last year, for the first time, NT Servers outsold all varieties of
> >Unix servers put together. This would indicate that a large portion of
> >the market believes that NT Server does provide a reliable computing
> >platform.
>
> This actually just reflects the tremendous effort (effort/power/money)
> that Microsoft has put into marketing the product. History shows us
I would also think it is a reflection on the stability of Unix. A well
managed Unix system will continue to run for many years. With NT,
consumers are locked into a cycle of hardware/software upgrades necessary
to fix those pesky bugs/security problems. I think this would
artificially inflate those sales figures IMHO.
Robin
**********
Robin M. Stephens. Computer Support Officer
Australian Science Archives Project
203 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053
Phone: +61 (03) 9344 9286 Fax: (03) 9349 4630
ASAPWeb! on http://www.asap.unimelb.edu.au
**********