[LINK] Re: Security Micro-HowTo vs. Adam's generalised Red Hatcritique

[Adam Todd]

>There is quite a gulf between stating that a product is buggy / faulty /
>crap and suggesting that it has been deliberatly compromised by a 
>vendor.

I didn't specify the vendor as "Red Hat" themselves created the deliberate
compromise.  In fact I suggested it wasn't that simple.


But that's OK.  Your point is taken.  On the same token many people bag NT
saying it's insecure and has vunerabilities.  They are all bugs one way or
another.