[LINK] error rates for censorware
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:28:19 +1000
At 01:05 PM 24/10/00 +1100, Rick Welykochy wrote:
>'In cases where the manufacturer claimed that "all sites blocked by
> our program are reviewed by staff first to ensure that the sites meet
> our criteria", we concluded that these claims were false. '
>Surely the consuming public has recourse to such false claims.
>A full refund, retraction of the lie and possible sanctions
>from the Dept of Trade perhaps?
>If I wuz a Yank, I'd sue Surfwatch's collective backsides off!
I raised this with people here last week - what would happen if this was
raised with the ACCC here? Would they 'care'?
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
firstname.lastname@example.org -- http://www.primenet.com/~jwhit/whitentr.htm
NEW: Olympic adventure pics - http://www.primenet.com/~jwhit/olympicpics.htm