[LINK] Fyi: RSACi/ICRA developments

[Danny Yee]

Stephen Loosley wrote:
> Thus, from my personal perspective, and in terms of my websites, may as
> well rate them, voluntarily as Karl asserts, & just spread the word honestly?

Why?  Because you've been browbeaten into using the system through
the threat of losing some viewers?

> Regarding what's right for others, who knows?  Danny's 'anatomical' pages
> would apparently present some difficulties I would not like to have to resolve.

None of the sites I'm most involved with could be rated 0 0 0 0,
or at least if they can it's not obvious.

	http://danny.oz.au/
(Has the entire list of words banned by a iFilter, not to mention
my "controversial material collection" :-)

	http://dannyreviews.com/
(Some of the reviews in e.g. http://dannyreviews.com/s/sex.html
would fail the language test, if nothing else.  The site is 100%
image-free, though.)

	http://www.caa.org.au/ 
(Contains the F word on a few pages, and torture and rape are
unfortunate realities in some of the places Oxfam CAA works.)

	http://www.anatomy.usyd.edu.au/
(Had some pretty grizzly anatomical stuff, though I think most of
that is now restricted access.)

Rating none of these sites is practical, even if I didn't have
ideological objections to using a brain-dead rating scheme designed
for conservative Western wowsers.

Danny.