[LINK] Counter-productive bells and whistles
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:48:54 +1100
At 03:14 PM 29/10/01 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>my theory is that they got suckered by some slick salesman/consultant
>(who, as it happens can't even make their own site work - it's flash
I don't always do it myself, but does anyone take the time still to tell
the management of these organisations that they are no longer accessible
and have wasted their money so they can demand it back for
non-performance? One would assume that a working product would be a basic
requirement of any contract.
Maybe that is the solution to the problem - get the designer/contractors to
not get paid or have to do work over to eliminate the poor
decisions. Heck, make that awful/bad/terrible/dysfunctional decisions.
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
firstname.lastname@example.org -- http://www.primenet.com/~jwhit/whitentr.htm