[LINK] .sex considered harmful
Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:26:48 +1000
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
|> Behalf Of Danny Yee
|> Sent: Sunday, 9 September 2001 4:11 PM
|> To: Craig Sanders
|> Cc: viveka; email@example.com; Stop Censorship
|> Subject: [LINK] .sex considered harmful
|> Craig Sanders wrote:
|> > i think it would be great if .sex existed and all/most porn sites used
|> > it.
|> Any kind of mandatory or "encouraged" .sex is a really bad idea for
|> the same reasons RSACi is a bad idea.
Personally I would like to see a metadata tag to indicate sites with adult
content. But I don't see it happening, the adult industry can't seem to get
any acceptable standards into place. You only have to look around and see
how many sites there are with explicit pictures on the home page, and don't
have any warning page.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.