[LINK] .sex considered harmful
Sun, 09 Sep 2001 20:35:35 +1000
>Any kind of mandatory or "encouraged" .sex is a really bad idea for
>the same reasons RSACi is a bad idea. (And if RSACi's shoehorning
>everything into 1 to 4 ratings in four categories is blunt, shoehorning
>everything into .sex and not .sex would be even worse.)
Actually, the issue isn't so much ...
>The big problem: Who decides what is or is not "sex"? Saudi Arabia?
>The Australian Family Association with their labrador fetish? Me?
But the fact that people who run the "referal credits" Adult Banner sites
don't give a flying F*** what domain name their sites sit under, as long as
the banners are displayed and users click them.
So the reality is, .sex will make no difference.