[LINK] Aust state domain name plan approved

[ron ipsen]

Sorry guys, but this OCOS proposal is the biggest load of sh*t I have seen 
for a long time. It was around a few years ago when i was on the new names 
policy and still hasnt resolved its own inherit issues.

Seems the same self interested ppl are pushing the same proposal to an 
equally stupid government and even Auda are falling for it. I had expected 
so much from them.

After spending 7 years teaching communities to publish their own 
information there are a few basic flaws in the philosophy that are 
glaringly apparent.

  1) who is the community?
           Oh I know they have a little politically correct way of 
distributing publishing rights but it is still top down political and not 
grass roots, or even at the level of small business.

  2) system consistency, its fine to have a intuitive domain name system, 
that is geographically based, but for it to be usefull the layout and 
structure of each site must be consistent. This consistency must be between 
states, between regions and between individual communities. No loose forum 
is going to establish that. It is the lesson of the .us namespace and AUDA 
and OCOS are still ignoring it.

  3 ) central (national) managment is required to make full use of the 
geographic DNS. domain names are for email as well as web. Allocation of 
this national resource so someone can promote "portal packages" or inflate 
their own standing is short sited to say the least.


Basically, its a load of crap, and a waste of a national resource.

Ron.
At 04:45 PM 14/11/02 +1100, you wrote:


>Aust state domain name plan approved
>The .au domain name administrator has confirmed plans to initiate second 
>level domain names for states and territories, a move touted as allowing 
>state or local groups to promote their interests online.
>  <http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?190159 >Read Full Story