[LINK] Messages to be monitored before going to schools
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:03:17 +1100
Well, it depends on who you talk to. I don't know about the original plan,
but I know the Teachers Federation wants the trial (of e-mail monitoring) to
remain in place for a full school year (2003) to test it, while the
department apparently wants to roll it out as soon as the e-mail system is
ready. Ie, they don't seem to consider it a trial, as such...
> Did some digging. The monitoring is definitely old news. Here's a snip
> the Unisys press release, dated 17th April 2002.
> "The service and infrastructure, to be integrated and hosted by Unisys,
> provide filtered Internet and email services and accounts, web hosting
> services and remote access for up to 1.2 million school and TAFE students
> and 130,000 teachers and staff over three years."
> There is a genuine news angle in the tussle between the Teachers' Fed and
> the DET. But the funny thing is that the SMH has let the DET and Unisys
> the hook, because the election+union context is a distraction from the
> changes of plans.
> Here are the different rollout plans:
> - three years (original press release)
> - by June this year (SMH, August 26, 2002)
> - by December (current story) - ie, "oops, no hope of getting it done by
> And: last August, the filters were "under development".
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Maltby [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 16:40
> > To: Adam Todd
> > Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: [LINK] Messages to be monitored before going to schools
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:56:44PM +1100, Adam Todd wrote:
> > > Just in case no one picked this up ... Interesting
> > comments - particularly
> > > about allegations and child protection.
> > Indeed.
> > > Messages to be monitored before going to schools
> > > By Linda Doherty, Education Writer
> > > February 17 2003
> > <snip>
> > > "There's no doubt that student emails will be monitored.
> > The department [of
> > > education] has the capacity to monitor every single email
> > communication,"
> > > Ms Leete said.
> > I really doubt that they do. And if they do, it's hardly the
> > best way to
> > spend education dollars...
> > > "We are advising our members that there is no such thing as
> > a confidential
> > > email."
> > Fair enough, but that's not the same as "all emails will be
> > monitored".
> > > All public schools and TAFE colleges are scheduled to have
> > the email
> > > accounts by December, at a cost of $33 million. The
> > Government will also
> > > provide email accounts for up to 2000 parents and citizens
> > organisations in
> > > schools.
> > That's a lot of bucks for what should be a cookie-cutter rollout. Must
> > be using MS Exchange etc. I wonder if they've factored in the cost of
> > hacking?
> > > This story was found at:
> > > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/16/1045330466694.html
> > _______________________________________________
> > Link mailing list
> > Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
> > http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
> Link mailing list