[LINK] Fax Cover page disclaimers
link at todd.inoz.com
Fri Apr 30 08:02:05 EST 2004
> > Does this mean Howards office is now going to take legal action against
> > for leaking/using/publishing the misdirected fax?
> > Or does this mean that the disclaimer is totally worthless because no
> > basis of contract exists between the sender and the recipient?
>Contract isn't in it, it might be a breach of copyright though, but the
>media might argue that the disclosure is "in the public interest", which
>IMO it very much is...
>Besides which could you see the public mudslinging that would go on if
>the gummint did try to sue 2UE for breach of copyright in this case.
Oh I'm right in the middle of mud slinging right now. I'm shooting an
exclusive documentary about the feature film STEALTH being shot in the Blue
It's the first time I've been in front of 50 police and not been the target
of their attack!
The mud sling from all directions is incredible. Now I know why I'm called
the Iconoclast. I've uncovered an amazing twist to the story and hope to
have the final interview needed to really change the views of everyone
It's been really interesting to see how one man can be the meat in a three
way sandwich between Conservationist, Government and a Film Company.
Even a bush fire isn't as hot as the heat this guy is taking!
Watch for the Doco, it will be specially screened in the Mountains in a few
weeks and hopefully on TV around the same time.
More information about the Link