[LINK] All UK (and world) uni research online and free?
Stephen Loosley
stephen at melbpc.org.au
Wed Aug 4 21:28:28 EST 2004
Hi all ..
Possibly a landmark report for the whole world.
(Eg, the final paragraph of this UK Gov Report)
> From: <IRN at hw.ac.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:35 PM
> Subject: Issue 119, Internet Resources Newsletter
>
> There's a lot of interest just now in the Report of the House of
> Commons Science and Technology Select Committee, available at:
>
>
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm
>
> which recommends that all UK higher education institutions establish
> institutional repositories on which their published output can be stored
> and from which it can be read, free of charge, online.
And at the UK Parliament website referenced above, here is the summary
page for the Committee's report. It appears to make a lot of sense, imho:
> Academic libraries are struggling to purchase subscriptions to all the
journal titles needed by their users.
This is due both to the high and increasing journal prices imposed by
commercial publishers and the inadequacy of library budgets to meet the
demands placed upon them by a system supporting an ever increasing volume of
research.
Whilst there are a number of measures that can be taken by publishers,
libraries and academics to improve the provision of scientific publications,
a Government strategy is urgently needed.
This Report recommends that all UK higher education institutions establish
institutional repositories on which their published output can be stored and
from which it can be read, free of charge, online.
It also recommends that Research Councils and other Government funders
mandate their funded researchers to deposit a copy of all of their articles
in this way.
The Government will need to appoint a central body to oversee the
implementation of the repositories; to help with networking; and to ensure
compliance with the technical standards needed to provide maximum
functionality. Set-up and running costs are relatively low, making
institutional repositories a cost-effective way of improving access to
scientific publications.
Institutional repositories will help to improve access to journals but a
more radical solution may be required in the long term. Early indications
suggest that the author-pays publishing model could be viable. We remain
unconvinced by many of the arguments mounted against it.
Nonetheless, this Report concludes that further experimentation is
necessary, particularly to establish the impact that a change of publishing
models would have on learned societies and in respect of the "free rider"
problem. In order to encourage such experimentation the Report recommends
that the Research Councils each establish a fund to which their funded
researchers can apply should they wish to pay to publish. The UK Government
has failed to respond to issues surrounding scientific publications in a
coherent manner and we are not convinced that it would be ready to deal with
any changes to the publishing process.
The Report recommends that Government formulate a strategy for future action
as a matter of urgency.
The preservation of digital material is an expensive process that poses a
significant technical challenge. This Report recommends that the British
Library receives sufficient funding to enable it to carry out this work. It
also recommends that work on new regulations for the legal deposit of
non-print publications begins immediately.
Failure to take these steps would result in a substantial breach in the
intellectual record of the UK.
The market for scientific publications is international. The UK cannot act
alone. For this reason we recommended that the UK Government act as a
proponent for change on the international stage and lead by example. This
will ultimately benefit researchers across the globe.
--
Cheers all ..
Stephen Loosley
More information about the Link
mailing list