[LINK] Question: How do you protect Windows?
Howard Lowndes
lannet at lannet.com.au
Mon Dec 13 12:17:30 EST 2004
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:38, Webb, KerryA wrote:
> RC wrote:
> >
> > Craig,
> >
> > All of the below advice is misdirected; not because it's
> > wrong, but because looking from the outside at "me", there
> > are only two options I can see.
> >
> > Either:
> > a) I am not capable of an informed decision, in which case
> > I'm also probably incapable of installing a *nix, learning
> > how to install and run compatibility software, and so on;
> > or
> > b) I am capable of an informed decision, in which case I'm
> > running Windows on purpose, believing my security measures
> > adequate to the task.
> >
> > My evidence for (b) is, as I said, a lack of attacks, and a
> > long virus-free existence. There's no discoverable spyware
> > (thank you Mozilla), my wife and I never fall for the
> > attachment IQ test, and my kids only have plain-text e-mail
> > (and No Instant Messenger).
> >
> > There are other reasons, most particularly reliability, which
> > would convince me, but it can wait until I can afford the
> > time to plan the change, and make it reverseable if need be.
> >
>
> I agree. At home I run Windows 98SE and am suffering more than one crash per week. I want a more reliable platform but am unwilling (for a number of reasons) to upgrade to XP.
>
> I've been looking at Linux options and am confused, bewildered and generally not confident that I can
>
> (a) install such a system myself, and
I have to say that, even though I might be above average knowledgable on
Linux, I don't think I could find anything easier to install than the
Desktop version of Fedora Core 3. Sure it takes the pickings from 4
CDs, which you can download as iso images and burn if you need to (in my
case I keep them on a server on my network as iso images and then do an
NFS install when I am building another Linux box), but it does take a
lot less time the installing Windows _and_ you get all the apps
installed _and_ only 1 reboot - right at the end.
> (b) keep it up to date easily.
So, what is hard about a cron job running "up2date -u" on a daily or
weekly basis?
>
> I'm not a computer expert, but I think I know enough to know what I don't know.
If you went the XP path there would probably be more learning needed
than with the FC3 path.
>
> A Macintosh is looking pretty good at the moment.
Yes, and remember that that has a Unix core - FreeBSD.
>
> Kerry
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient:
> Please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately.
> You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
--
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates;
Your Linux people <http://www.lannetlinux.com>
------------------------------------------
"When you just want a system that works, you choose Linux;
when you want a system that just works, you choose Microsoft."
------------------------------------------
"Flatter government, not fatter government;
Get rid of the Australian states."
More information about the Link
mailing list