[LINK] copyright is not property

[Rick Welykochy]

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

> I dont have time to go over all the arguments in these links
> but some of these are deeply flawed.

and then

> now swap breach of copyright with tresspassing. say to escape the tiger
> you have to go through someones property but you cant because they have
> put a fence around it. the tiger dines. does this mean there is
> a moral argument against physical property rights? unlikely.

The above is a fallacious argument: proof by analogy is fraud.
Your substitution isn't worthy of argument in the context of
IPR.

A case of the Vic pot calling the libertarian kettles black.


cheers
rickw



-- 
_________________________________
Rick Welykochy || Praxis Services

For years, Microsoft has had a policy of announcing products that don't
exist yet, to cause customers to stop buying a competitor's product.
That's Vapourware.  Is it really any shock that they would want to prevent
customers from using more robust OSs and tools, by offering Vapoursecurity?
      -- David Maxwell on Full Disclosure