[LINK] Is it unethical to infringe a patent?
cas at taz.net.au
Sat Aug 19 19:46:11 EST 2006
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 06:56:00PM +1000, Brendan Scott wrote:
> just that whether it is patented is neither necessary nor sufficient.
> (Although Vic's position on this is unclear)
vic's position on this will be the same as his position on any other
issue: he will be in favour of whatever suits any particular business
(the larger the better) at the moment, regardless of whether that is
consistent with whatever suited them in the past or what might suit them
in the future.
vic's barracking for what he thinks of as 'the right side'. it's not
about reason, it's about being in the cheer squad.
craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
More information about the Link