[LINK] Brtannica vs Wikipedia breaks out again

Craig Sanders cas at taz.net.au
Wed Mar 29 12:45:40 EST 2006


On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:16:54AM +1000, Richard Chirgwin wrote:
> Actually, the row is now between Britannica and Nature. The EB has
> posted a refutation of the original Nature article here:

Richard, have you ever noticed that while you're mostly sane and reasonable on
most issues, when it comes to "new media" things like blogs and wikipedia
you're as one-eyed, biased, and unreasonable as Vic with his anti-FOSS
crusade?


craig

-- 
craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au>           (part time cyborg)


More information about the Link mailing list