[LINK] Brtannica vs Wikipedia breaks out again
Craig Sanders
cas at taz.net.au
Wed Mar 29 12:45:40 EST 2006
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:16:54AM +1000, Richard Chirgwin wrote:
> Actually, the row is now between Britannica and Nature. The EB has
> posted a refutation of the original Nature article here:
Richard, have you ever noticed that while you're mostly sane and reasonable on
most issues, when it comes to "new media" things like blogs and wikipedia
you're as one-eyed, biased, and unreasonable as Vic with his anti-FOSS
crusade?
craig
--
craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
More information about the Link
mailing list