[LINK] We live in interesting times.... Or - is the gold standard really extinct.
Jim.Birch at dhhs.tas.gov.au
Mon Oct 20 17:59:30 EST 2008
From: Tom Koltai
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2008 4:13 PM
>Regulation is fine thing, if we want to build a more top-heavy govt
infrustructure. My own slightly cynical experience is that Regulation is
written by lawyers with deliberate loopholes so that other lawyers can
find the loopholes.
Regulation - and law in general - is always a battle between the
lawmakers and the evaders. But if the alternative is no law...
>eventually the winner will call on the iou.
Yes, but if he has to get his gold through eleven layers of contacts
that may include bankrupt parties it still not work. Anyone can
overestimate the value of an asset and go bankrupt; gold isn't going to
stop that. Unfortunately we had a situation where everyone was doing
>A consequence of the departure from the gold standard is that the price
of gold is trading approxiuately 1600(USD) per ounce under its real
Alternately, arbitrarily choice of gold as the basis for currency might
cause the price of gold to escalate beyond it real value.
>...Therefore, whilst I am not against mortgages per se, I am against
concept of securitising the (future value)or basically the cause of the
cpi index rise and calling it capital to justify higher lending.
Isn't this what accounting rules are all about?
>Real wealth can only be made by manufacture/construction.
Healthcare is not wealth? Education is not wealth? The wealthier we
get the higher the proportion of "intangibles" in our wealth.
>Any system that allows for the markets to calculate security based on a
probable future value is bound to lose.
Yes, and this is entirely possible under the gold standard, or the Mars
Bar standard for that matter.
I'm not an economist but I do read a bit and I certainly haven't heard
the clarion call for the gold standard from the economists I respect.
The gold standard does induce a certain level of KTBH from governments
but it has its' own significant structure problems too. Not the road to
We're off topic.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.
More information about the Link