[LINK] NBN retail cost
rchirgwin at ozemail.com.au
Thu Mar 10 15:40:25 EST 2011
On 10/03/11 3:03 PM, Roger Clarke wrote:
> At 3:44 +0000 10/3/11, stephen at melbpc.org.au wrote:
>> 'Forty percent prefer 4G wireless broadband to fibre poll, equals NBN
>> financial headache'
>> By Stan Beer Thursday, 10th March 2011 (snip)
>> Out of 325 total votes, 59% said 'No, Australia needs both technologies,'
>> while 40% said 'Yes, I would prefer to use wireless 4G in the future'.
> Stan's (ab)use of the data is almost as bad as the ridiculous survey:
> Let's see now:
> - 'Does wireless 4G technology pose a threat to the NBN?'
> - The only options that appear to have been available are only
> a fraction of the field of play:
> - 'No, Australia needs both technologies'
> - 'No, but NOT Australia needs both technologies'
> - 'Yes, I would prefer to use wireless 4G in the future'
> - 'Yes, but NOT I would prefer to use wireless 4G in the future
> i.e. the No was coupled with one irrelevant statement
> and the Yes was coupled with a differently irrelevant statement
> - only 3 out of 325 people voted 'Eh? Pardon?'
> - no population, sampling-frame, sample selection method or
> response-rate were declared
> - it appears to have been the usual rubbish of take-whatever-comes
> - internal validity zero
> - external validity zero
> Has the media not the slightest skerrick of scepticism about these
> rubbish polls?
Choose one of the below:
* We are extremely sceptical about all polling results, and rigorously
test the statistical assumptions behind each survey offered to us.
* We don't have time to test survey results, but try to adopt a
sceptical position to surveys.
* We failed Stats 101 at university.
* Wow! Clickbait!
Results will be compiled and published tomorrow.
By the way, from the second par of the story:
> large screen wireless broadband connections in exclusively wireless
> house-holds continue to grow rapidly.
What the blazes is a "large screen wireless broadband connection"?
More information about the Link