[IntLawProfessors] Fwd: IntLawGrrls - 25 Oct 2010

[Don Anton]

IntLawGrrls 
 


Update: Khadr pleads guilty 
Khadr to settle? 
On October 25 
Update: Khadr pleads guilty 
Posted: 25 Oct 2010 08:47 AM PDT


Omar Khadr has pleaded guilty to 5 terrorism charges.
According to a report by the Washington Post's Peter Finn, the plea entered this morning by a military commissions judge at Guantánamo provides for an additional year of detention at that U.S. naval base, followed by 7 years more in prison in Canada, Khadr's birthplace.
Below are my thoughts posted in anticipation of this latest development in this case of a captured child soldier. 

Khadr to settle? 
Posted: 24 Oct 2010 10:05 PM PDT
Emanating from Guantánamo yesterday:
News stories reporting rumors that the military commissions case of United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr is about to end with a plea bargain.
If not, trial is set to begin later this morning in a GTMO courtroom.
Confirming rumors reported by the Los Angeles Times' Carol J. Williams on Saturday, Reuters' Jane Sutton speculated on a reputed agreement by which Khadr, now 24 (above right), would serve "one more year at Guantanamo, followed by seven years in his native Canada." (image credit) Sutton added that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had talked Sunday with her counterpart in Canada, which would have to approve any such deal.
Later on Sunday, Michelle Shepard of the Toronto Star, author of a book on the case, acknowledged such speculation, but stressed the statement by "Khadr’s Canadian lawyer Dennis Edney" that "there was no deal, 'as of this moment.'" Shepard thus continued with a preview of the trial, should it occur.
The Miami Herald's Carol Rosenberg, meanwhile, led with concern that any Khadr deal might remain secret (as has that of another detainee). Such secrecy would challenge "[t]he Obama administration's quest to show that military commissions can be as transparent and fair as other U.S. courts," Rosenberg reported.
(Indeed, as posted in the update above, this morning Khadr did plead. The agreement was not released, but is believed to provide for the sentence described in this post.)
As blogreaders well know from our prior posts, Khadr was 15 (above, middle) when seized by U.S. military personnel during a firefight in Afghanistan. He has spent 1/3 of his life in American custody. As detailed in his Department of Defense case file, Khadr now faces trial on charges of, inter alia, throwing a grenade that killed a member of the U.S. special forces during the firefight.
At the preliminary hearing that I attended in December 2008, defense lawyers indicated that proof of the charges at trial may prove difficult. From the beginning, however, proceedings have focused on 2 other aspects of the case:
► 1st, what Khadr suffered, including treatment as a "human mop."
► 2d, that if the acts alleged in fact occurred, Khadr was a child soldier. That fact alone ought to preclude prosecution and punishment, many have argued -- among them our colleague David M. Crane, former Chief Prosecutor for the Special Court for Sierra Leone.
The plea agreement bruited in yesterday's media would seem to take neither aspect into account.
Assuming speculation is correct, Khadr would not see release until after having served 16 years in custody -- a sentence scarcely seeming to incorporate much mitigation on account of detention conditions or any other reason.
The reputed deal departs markedly from international law with regard to child soldiers.
Consider the 2000 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict. In Article 6(3) states parties agree to


take all feasible measures to ensure that persons within their jurisdiction recruited or used in hostilities contrary to the present Protocol are demobilized or otherwise released from service. States Parties shall, when necessary, accord to such persons all appropriate assistance for their physical and psychological recovery and their social reintegration.
Article 7(1) continues in like vein:


States Parties shall cooperate in the implementation of the present Protocol, including in the prevention of any activity contrary thereto and in the rehabilitation and social reintegration of persons who are victims of acts contrary thereto, including through technical cooperation and financial assistance. Such assistance and cooperation will be undertaken in consultation with the States Parties concerned and the relevant international organizations.
The treaty's view that the children are "victims" and deserving of "rehabilitation and social reintegration," as well as "physical and psychological recovery," is obviously at odds with a prosecution and punishment strategy with regard to these same children.
It is at odds, then, with the reported disposition of Khadr.
Canada became a full state party to the protocol in July 2000; the United States, in December 2002. The countries' statements at ratification said nothing to undercut the force of the articles quoted -- which, as indicated in this report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, jibe with other treaties.
Wonder whether either state will address this discrepancy. 

On October 25 
Posted: 24 Oct 2010 09:01 PM PDT
On this day in ...
... 1962, at the U.N. Security Council in New York, the U.S. Ambassador to the United States, Adlai E.Stevenson, challenged his Soviet counterpart to explain the presence of nuclear missiles in Cuba. When the Soviet ambassador declined to give an immediate answer (possibly because he lacked instructions from Moscow), Stevenson -- formerly an Illinois Governor (and before that, an attaché at the U.N. Charter conference in San Francisco) who'd become known for his wit in 2 unsuccessful bids for the U.S. Presidency -- went on the offensive. He told the Soviet envoy he could wait "till hell freezes over"; in the interim, he set up easels and displayed enlarged photographs (above left), evidence of the installations. High points in this video clip; more here and here on Stevenson and others who played a role in the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 (prior InLawGrrls posts here, here, here, and here).




(Prior October 25 posts are here, here, and here.) 

You are subscribed to email updates from IntLawGrrls 
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1531 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0002.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpg
Size: 6337 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0004.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/com
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0003.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpg
Size: 10854 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0005.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 12922 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0003.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpg
Size: 2292 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0006.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/com
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0004.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpg
Size: 7523 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0007.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/com
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/private/intlawprofessors/attachments/20101026/bf6e90ad/attachment-0005.bin