[LINK] unlawful interception of internet traffic?

Craig Sanders cas at taz.net.au
Thu Dec 7 17:37:22 AEDT 2006

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:35:49PM +1100, Brendan Scott wrote:
> > i'm pretty sure that all of this is actually illegal because it's an
> > unlawful interception of communications traffic....and while the IP
> > address blocking may be a squirmable grey-area (at least according to
> > a lawyer's infinitely flexible connection with reality), the actual
> I will ignore that comment for the time being. 


how about "casual relationship with the truth"?

> > anyone know off hand whether this is true? and maybe even the
> > name/section etc of the relevant Act(s)?
> Cybercrime Act
> http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/ActCompilation1.nsf/current%5Cbytitle/B41FA6A771562426CA256F7100560107?OpenDocument&mostrecent=1



craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au>           (part time cyborg)

More information about the Link mailing list