[LINK] YouTube and copyright
kim at holburn.net
Mon Jul 17 19:34:59 AEST 2006
I too have wondered how YouTube can put up some of the stuff it does.
YouTube and the copyright cops: safe... for now?:
> If you've never heard of YouTube, let me introduce you: YouTube is
> a massively popular video sharing site that has quickly become one
> of the Internet's most trafficked websites, climbing into the top
> 50 of all sites online in a year's time (as tracked by Alexa).
> According to Nielsen NetRatings, the site serves almost 13 million
> users a month and serves up 50 million videos each day. Maybe
> you've been by the site to see Jon Stewart's hilarious (yet
> depressingly accurate) coverage of the "'Net neutrality" debate, or
> maybe you enjoyed watching Ernesto Hoost and friends in Silent
> Library. And maybe, just maybe, you've enjoyed some videos that
> weren't uploaded without the copyright owner's permission, too.
> See, YouTube's continued survival is bit of a mystery to some. The
> site thrives in part on what appears to be copyright infringement,
> but aside from a few scuffles (most notably with NBC), there's been
> nothing Napster-ish about its history. TV clips, movie clips, you
> name it... they all appear on the site regularly, and without
> authorization. So far, the major lawsuits haven't shown up.
> Daniel Pearl, Deputy editor of BBC's Newsnight, recently compared
> life at the venerable Beeb to life at YouTube. Noting that the BBC
> has to get clearance for everything that it uses, Pearl asks, "So
> why is there one rule for us and another for YouTube?" That is, why
> does the BBC get hit with letters, licensing demands, and potential
> lawsuits when they use unauthorized material, yet YouTube is packed
> to the gills with it. "Perhaps someone could explain," he says.
> For Pearl and others with similar questions, you're in luck. See,
> while the BBC and other news organizations are accountable for what
> they show to users, YouTube is built upon laws that give them a
> safe harbor. And believe it or not, it's the DMCA protecting YouTube
> —the same DMCA that is destroying fair use. As the EFF's Fred von
> Lohmann explains in an editorial for The Hollywood Reporter Esq.,
> YouTube is shielded because the site is an "online service
> provider," arguably similar to your own Internet Service Provider
> (ISP). Among other things, the DMCA provides protection for service
> providers against being held responsible for the actions of their
> users. Much like the RIAA can't sue Comcast for little Jimmy's
> pirate web server he hosts on their broadband network, so too with
> As an online service provider, YouTube seemingly has an out of
> almost any trouble you can throw at it. A disgruntled copyright
> owner must first supply the company with a legal notice of the
> infringement (the infamous takedown notice), and YouTube can stay
> in the clear by merely identifying the infringing material and
> removing it. They're safe from damages, even if 20,000 people
> watched the unauthorized material. Why? Because they only host it.
> Users upload the video (never mind how they got it), and that's
> ultimately the big distinction between YouTube and, say, the BBC.
> If the Beeb showed a 10 minute clip without authorization, they
> could be liable for thousands of dollars. YouTube, no.
> As von Lohmann points out, this isn't a license to print money.
> YouTube can lose its safe harbor protections if it appears that
> they are directly profiting from the infringement of copyrights by
> their users. In von Lohmann's opinion, this is why YouTube only
> shows advertisements on pages without video on them. As the company
> searches for a business model, it will be critically important for
> them to stay away from anything that looks to capitalize on, well,
> one of the things that makes the site so popular: copyright
Ph: +61 2 61258620 M: +61 417820641 F: +61 2 6230 6121
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Cacert Root Cert: http://www.cacert.org/cacert.crt
Aust. Spam Act: To stop receiving mail from me: reply and let me know.
Use ISO 8601 dates [YYYY-MM-DD] http://www.saqqara.demon.co.uk/
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link