[LINK] Plagiarism and Encyclopaedias [WAS Wikipedia Critic ...]
Roger Clarke
Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au
Wed Nov 8 13:22:00 AEDT 2006
To the extent that there's an authoritative definition in Australia,
this one is probably it:
"To plagiarize shall be understood to mean the presentation of the
documented words or ideas of another as his or her own, without
attribution appropriate for the medium of presentation. ... A
researcher or reviewer shall not intentionally or recklessly ...
plagiarize" (AVCC, 1997)
I published a paper earlier this year on 'plagiarism by academics'.
(Most of the plentiful literature comprises academics complaining
about students, rather than getting their own house in order):
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html
I argued that:
(a) the issue is a lot more complicated than people think
(b) serious plagiarism occurs, but most isn't all that grievous
(c) appropriate approaches depend on a number of factors, including
the nature of the work
In discussing the nature of the work, I left out encyclopaedias!
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html#RTFToC29
But they approximate to textbooks, and I included a specific proposal
relating to "Evaluation Criteria for Plagiarism in a Textbook":
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html#RTFToC24
The most common approach adopted by textbook authors is "no citation
within the text, but attribution to the source in notes at the end of
each chapter or the book as a whole", and it's appropriate and
effective. So that would seem a sensible default approach or
benchmark for encyclopaedias as well.
Generally, one would expect a reference work to:
(a) draw on other works
(b) include a lot of information that is generally known
(c) make the information readily accessible
(and of course smothering it in references conflicts with that aim)
The need for attribution increases with:
(a) the originality of the copied material
(b) the size of the copied material
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html#RTFToC31
In the case of an encyclopaedia, copying without attribution doesn't
seem to me to be an issue except where:
** there is verbatim or near-verbatim copying of:
- whole articles
- segments of substantial size (e.g. at least a key paragraph)
** copying of ideas that are highly original
Even in these cases, it would appear that general attribution (i.e.
no attribution within the text, but "inclusion of details of the
source in a reasonably adjacent bibliography, e.g. in a recommended
reading list at the end of the [article]") would be quite sufficient:
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html#RTFToC32
As a test, the discovery that a sentence in an encyclopaedia is a
verbatim or near-verbatim copy of one in a text-book, an
authoritative academic article or another encyclopaedia, shouldn't
really upset readers; and it shouldn't really upset the
copyright-owner either - although if the source was *that* useful, it
would seem appropriate to include the source in the article's
reference-list.
The segment on copyright accords with what Glen Turner wrote:
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/SOS/Plag0602.html#RTFToC17
Briefly, "the presence or absence of permission to republish has no
simple relationship to the question of plagiarism, and in many cases
may have no relationship at all", and just because the approach
adopted is reasonable behaviour from the viewpoint of plagiarism
doesn't mean that copyright-owners and their agents are precluded
from issuing media releases, sending nastygrams, suing, and even
maybe winning.
--
Roger Clarke http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 1472, and 6288 6916
mailto:Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au http://www.xamax.com.au/
Visiting Professor in Info Science & Eng Australian National University
Visiting Professor in the eCommerce Program University of Hong Kong
Visiting Professor in the Cyberspace Law & Policy Centre Uni of NSW
More information about the Link
mailing list