[LINK] Brazillians have been doing electronic voting for years

Jan Whitaker jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Sat Nov 18 12:13:24 AEDT 2006


At 11:05 AM 18/11/2006, rchirgwin at ozemail.com.au wrote:
>What did I say about delegating democracy to those who can read 
>code? Here we have the problem spun as a positive. This is *not* 
>transparency, because it's transparency restricted to a sub-group of 
>people (PS: a reason that the political class may like and/or 
>endorse e-voting is indicated in this very paragraph. "All political 
>parties for auditing" - a concentration of part of the process 
>upwards to the parties._).

I actually don't have a problem with that level of transparency, 
Richard. All sorts of things in society are handled by experts, your 
term sub-groups, on our behalf and we don't need to know how the 
thing works, but we do need trust that the system is being observed 
and challenged. There is margin of error in every election, no matter 
how perfect it may be designed.

Jan
(who is procratinating writing the last major piece of her latest 
novel; see the blog for info)

Jan Whitaker
JLWhitaker Associates, Melbourne Victoria
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
personal: http://www.janwhitaker.com/personal/
commentary: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/

'Seed planting is often the most important step. Without the seed, 
there is no plant.' - JW, April 2005
_ __________________ _




More information about the Link mailing list