[LINK] RFID in Govt, and in People
Geoff Ramadan
gramadan at umd.com.au
Tue Oct 3 13:24:52 AEST 2006
RFID/Inductive coupling does not propogate waves. It uses magnetic coupling, so
it is a closed loop. i.e. it is not like a radio transmitter, its like a
transformer.
Kim Holburn wrote:
>
> On 2006 Oct 03, at 1:09 PM, Geoff Ramadan wrote:
>
>> On my brief skimming, the articles make no mention of "magnetic" beam
>> forming. They are all referring to "beam-forming" in the "far-field"
>> EM waves or "wave cancellation".
>
> The last link was about audio beam forming; beam forming can be done
> with any wave forms.
>
>> Library RFID systems use 13.56Mhz RFID technology. "Near-Field" or
>> "inductive technology".
>>
>> I don't know how how this translates.
>>
>> A traditional "magnetic" beam-former would need to use some form of
>> "magnetic conductive" medium like ferrites, (the stuff that
>> transformers and inductors use).
>
> I assume RFID tags are powered by some kind of low frequency
> electromagnetic waves? You would just need a grid of things to produce
> a moving magnetic field like say electromagnets and software of course.
>
>>
>> Reg
>> Geoffrey Ramadan
>>
>>
>> Kim Holburn wrote:
>>> On 2006 Oct 03, at 12:36 PM, Geoff Ramadan wrote:
>>>> Kim
>>>>
>>>> Libraries are already using RFID for books and security. Though not
>>>> in the way you described. A reader is either at the Counter or is in
>>>> a "self check-out" systems.
>>>> check out.
>>>> http://www.dalibtech.com/
>>>> http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/Libraries/Structure/About/TheCentre.aspx
>>>>
>>>> I assume you are joking about the clandestine reading?
>>> Not really, a flight of fancy more like. With a directed magnetic
>>> beam former and an rfid reader it wouldn't be too hard.
>>> It's hard to find non-technical stuff on beam-formers:
>>> http://www.embedded.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=60401726
>>> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990IPRSP.137..267Y
>>> http://www.innovative-dsp.com/products/ancapp.htm
>>>>
>>>> Reg
>>>> Geoffrey Ramadan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kim Holburn wrote:
>>>>> I have thought for a while that Libraries would be a great use. for
>>>>> RFID A reader at the door would mean you would just have to walk
>>>>> out with the books and the library could automatically check them
>>>>> out to you! Also staff could locate a miscatalogued book much more
>>>>> easily than now.
>>>>> On the other hand, for privacy reasons maybe it wouldn't be such a
>>>>> good idea!!! I clandestine reader at the door could tell someone
>>>>> what you were reading - but then a government organisation wanting
>>>>> that info could look up the database anyway and I seem to remember
>>>>> a bill that allows ASIO to hack into databases and read and change
>>>>> data legally.
>>>>> On 2006 Oct 03, at 11:13 AM, Geoff Ramadan wrote:
>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most RFID inquiries our industry get (including us) are crap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most people have no real understanding of RFID and their
>>>>>> applications, and even less understanding of the limitations,
>>>>>> including Government Departments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We generally find that solutions to customer issues can be found
>>>>>> in other technology means, including barcoding or process changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can quote you one example where a Government department wanted
>>>>>> to RFID tag documents, thinking that they could wave a magic wand
>>>>>> and locate them. What they really needed was a process change, as
>>>>>> their work practices were extremely sloppy with no accountability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, there is a growing interest and applications in
>>>>>> "non-human" asset management as indicated in the article.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a strong trend towards active RFID tags for "location
>>>>>> based tracking" of assets. Hospitals and Mining being an excellent
>>>>>> example of this type of applications. The assets are expensive
>>>>>> (eg. Medical devices) which are very mobile and need to be located
>>>>>> efficiently, therefore gaining better utilisation and lowering
>>>>>> capital costs, while improving services.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Government departments I suspect there is an interest in asset
>>>>>> tracking of notebooks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Geoffrey Ramadan, B.E.(Elec)
>>>>>> Chairman, Automatic Data Capture Australia (www.adca.com.au
>>>>>> <http://www.adca.com.au>)
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> Managing Director, Unique Micro Design (www.umd.com.au
>>>>>> <http://www.umd.com.au>)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger Clarke wrote:
>>>>>>> SMH/Age Next Section
>>>>>>> 3 October 2006
>>>>>>> Not so smart
>>>>>>> Almost a third of Australian government agencies have set aside
>>>>>>> money for RFID-related projects, despite knowing little about the
>>>>>>> technology, a new survey has found.
>>>>>>> RFID is the short-range wireless technology used in 'contactless'
>>>>>>> smartcards and e-passports.
>>>>>>> Consultants Booz Allen Hamilton interviewed people in 28
>>>>>>> Canberra-based government departments. Fewer than 10% had a good
>>>>>>> understanding of RFID standards, although money had been
>>>>>>> allocated for RFID projects. Three-quarters of respondents plan
>>>>>>> to investigate or use RFID within the next three years.
>>>>>>> [The local Booz site, which uses the suitably sceptical
>>>>>>> domain-name 'bah', doesn't seem to provide any information on the
>>>>>>> matter:
>>>>>>> http://www.bah.com.au/Whats_New/press_releases.htm
>>>>>>> [If anyone has any knowledge about what BAH thinks the 21
>>>>>>> departments think they plan on doing with RFID, a posting to the
>>>>>>> list, or an off-list note to me, would be appreciated. There are
>>>>>>> a few potential applications, e.g. in Defence Materiel; but most
>>>>>>> agencies don't actually do the kinds of physical things any more
>>>>>>> that RFID is potentially useful for]
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> In addition, the part of the Oz IT Section that operates purely
>>>>>>> as a relay for Media Releases (IT Business) has a breathless
>>>>>>> piece on RFID today.
>>>>>>> Fast track for radio tags
>>>>>>> Ben Woodhead
>>>>>>> Australian IT Section
>>>>>>> OCTOBER 03, 2006
>>>>>>> http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20500547%5E15302%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html
>>>>>>> AUSTRALIAN businesses are attaching radio frequency
>>>>>>> identification tags to sheep, trains, heavy mining equipment and
>>>>>>> nurses as they take advantage of the technology's ability to
>>>>>>> track assets and people.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> [The report is completely lacking in scepticism. That the
>>>>>>> reporter is prepared to have his name on it is a testament to how
>>>>>>> little self-respect many journos have these days. Although I'd
>>>>>>> better allow for the possibility that 'Woodhead' is a pseudonym,
>>>>>>> intended to convey that the reporter thinks the same about this
>>>>>>> kind of rubbish as the rest of us do.
>>>>>>> [Especially noticeable is the equivalent treatment of people and
>>>>>>> things. There's no distinction at all drawn between tracking and
>>>>>>> controlling gamblers, nurses and prisoners and doing the same
>>>>>>> thing to sheep, cattle, and mining and hospital equipment]
>
> --
> Kim Holburn
> IT Network & Security Consultant
> Ph: +61 2 61258620 M: +61 417820641 F: +61 2 6230 6121
> mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
> skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
> Cacert Root Cert: http://www.cacert.org/cacert.crt
> Aust. Spam Act: To stop receiving mail from me: reply and let me know.
> Use ISO 8601 dates [YYYY-MM-DD] http://www.saqqara.demon.co.uk/datefmt.htm
>
> Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
> -- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
>
>
>
More information about the Link
mailing list