[LINK] Airport to tag passengers

Frank O'Connor foconnor at ozemail.com.au
Wed Oct 18 15:29:27 AEST 2006

You dispute everything, Vic

You bitch all the time - you probably bitch if your birthday presents 
aren't wrapped. (Though God knows who would think enough of you to 
actually give you one.)

You alienate people deliberately. You are your own worst enemy. It's 
always everyone else's fault ... never yours.

You are an anti-social mental midget. You have no concept that others 
get tired and offended by your incessant ravings.

You insult others with gay abandon ... but perversely get offended 
when they return the compliment.

You are the List Loon.


At 12:23 PM +1000 on 18/10/06 you wrote:
>Paul Bolger [pbolger at gmail.com] wrote:
>>  At least Jan seems able to address the topic of the thread.
>I will dispute that, because its been asked numerous time what is the
>privacy issue? no one has yet responded other then to say variations of
>I dont like it.
>self anointed do gooders have a long history of inflicting damage and costs
>on the people they are dogooding towards.
>Ill ask it again, what is the privacy issue for rfid in airports? is it
>passengers want to have sex in the toilets?
>saying its not going to work is not a privacy issue, its a business
>issue. if it isnt going to add to the bottom line or improve customer
>service thats a business case that will have failed and only a badly run
>airport will persist with it or even implement it.
>so why do we need a privacy discussion about it at all? so far it seems
>to only be a business case discussion.
>Link mailing list
>Link at mailman.anu.edu.au

More information about the Link mailing list