[LINK] .xxx xxx'd
Alastair Rankine
arsptr at internode.on.net
Tue Apr 3 22:08:02 AEST 2007
On 02/04/2007, at 1:54 PM, David Goldstein wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
>
> PICS still exists in a child protection sense. First there was RSAC
> that amalgamated and merged into ICRA (Internet Content Rating
> Association) and now ICRA is part of the Family Online Safety
> Institute. See http://fosi.org/icra/.
Thanks for the link David.
It seems that PICS as a technology has been superseded by an RDF
vocabulary.
I was actually pretty impressed with that site. I was able to
generate a label in both PICS and RDF format and apply it to my site
very easily. Green light is good!
As always the problem with self-labelling is the potential for
deliberate abuse or honest misinterpretation. FOSI seem to make a
reasonable attempt at this, although I only discovered their
comprehensive label guidelines (http://checked.icra.org/
labelguidelines/) *after* creating the label. Also the language
ratings were sufficiently vague that I ended up simply picking the
middle-of-the-road rating in lieu of the missing "pretty clean but
occasional f-bombs".
I'm happy that the technology allows expression of "contexts", as in
"this image of the Birth of Venus contains nudity but in an artistic
context". Unhappily though there is no "sleaze" context .
More information about the Link
mailing list