[LINK] throw-away culture
kim at holburn.net
Mon Jan 22 07:15:44 AEDT 2007
Very interesting article about designing for sustainable use. I have
said before on link that one answer to the land-fill problem is to
put a disposal tax on things that need disposing. It seems it's
already happening and will increase.
Designing things - appliances that last - needs a different economic
approach - along the lines of a service rather than a product.
From issue 2585 of New Scientist magazine, 04 January 2007, page 31-35
Better by design: battling the throwaway culture (requires
subscription to read on-line)
> Americans use and throw away 2.5 million plastic bottles an hour.
> The British produce enough garbage to fill the Albert Hall every 2
> hours. According to the authors of Natural Capitalism, Paul Hawken,
> Amory Lovins and Hunter Lovins, only 1 per cent of all materials
> flowing through the US economy ends up in products still being used
> six months after manufacture. The waste entailed in our fleeting
> affairs with consumer durables is colossal.
> Take the average domestic power tool. However much DIY we plan on
> doing, the truth is we throw these away after using them, on
> average, for just 10 minutes. Most will serve "conscience time",
> gathering dust on a shelf in the garage, but the end is inevitable:
> thousands of years mouldering underground. A power tool consumes
> many times its own weight of resources in its design, manufacture,
> packaging, transportation and disposal, all for a shorter active
> lifespan than that of the adult mayfly.
> On the day you read this the same volume of trade will take place
> as occurred in the whole of 1949. We now make as many phone calls
> in a day as were made in the whole of 1983. The information age was
> supposed to lighten our economies and reduce our impact on the
> environment, but in fact the reverse seems to be happening. We have
> simply added information technology to the industrial era and
> speeded up the developed world's metabolism, Thackara argues.
> Once you grasp that, the cure is hardly rocket science: minimise
> waste and energy use, stop moving stuff around so much and use
> people more. Achieving this is not so easy, however. Growing
> numbers of people may be choosing to opt out by downsizing or
> embracing the ideology of the "slow movement", which seeks to
> reverse the frenetic pace of living, but a return to pre-industrial
> ways will never be a global solution. "We cannot stop tech,"
> Thackara says, "and there's no reason why we should. It's useful.
> But we need to change the innovation agenda in such a way that
> people come before tech."
> Consumer durables will increasingly be sold with plans already in
> place for their disposal - electronic goods will be designed to be
> recyclable, with the extra cost added onto the retail price as
> Japan is WEEEcycling
> In 2001, a critical shortage of landfill sites forced the Japanese
> government to pass a law adding the cost of recycling home
> appliances to the retail price. This gave manufacturers guaranteed
> revenue to invest in recycling plants. In 2004, 540,000 Sony
> televisions were recycled at the company's 15 recycling centres.
> With over 80 per cent of Japan's TVs now being recycled, the
> initiative has easily outperformed government targets.
> Another bill passed in the same year enshrines the principles of
> "reduce, reuse and recycle" for a whole swathe of consumer items.
> Computer manufacturers, for example, are now obliged to take back
> and recycle obsolete computers - users can have them collected or
> drop them off at post offices. A mark stamped on the computer
> indicates that recycling costs have been prepaid; otherwise
> consumers foot the bill. In 2004, Toshiba took back 5343 desktop
> PCs and 9568 laptops.
> Worldwide, discarded computers, mobile phones and electronic
> gadgets now account for 5 per cent of waste, according to the UN
> Environment Programme. In the US, between 14 and 20 million PCs are
> dumped each year. Electrical waste is the fastest-growing category
> in Europe, with the UK alone producing 1 million tonnes a year.
> The European Union has not been nearly as successful as Japan at
> dealing with the problem, though. In 2003 its directive on the
> recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
> became law, requiring producers in member countries to take
> responsibility for recycling and waste management, and for
> retailers to offer take-back services. However, member states have
> dragged their feet in implementing the directive, and this July the
> UK will become the last major EU country to comply.
> In the meantime, Japanese companies are starting to profit from
> having had to think carefully about designing more sustainable
> products, and are now exporting their expertise around the world
> through their subsidiaries. In 2005 Matsushita, owner of Panasonic,
> established Ecology Net Europe in Germany, a subsidiary aimed at
> capitalising on Europe's move to WEEE recycling. It sends employees
> to European recycling companies to advise on the feasibility and
> ease of disassembling various electrical appliances. Back in Japan,
> Hitachi and Toshiba are developing "design for disassembly"
> software to help create recyclable products, and Sharp has even
> achieved automated disassembly for some basic items, including
> battery chargers.
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3342707610
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link