Informed consent was: Re: [LINK] US-AMA far too complacent about human RFID tags

[Adam Todd]

At 05:38 PM 5/07/2007, Jan Whitaker wrote:
>At 12:58 PM 5/07/2007, Howard Lowndes wrote:
>>Therefore my assessment is that DNC is working as I have the number 
>>registered there, but the move has been towards unsolicited fax.
>
>Is that a loophole? You mean the govt passed a technology specific, 
>instead of neutral, law? Why should unsolicited faxes be allowed?

You know all you have to do is say that the communications is, to 
you, offensive, intimidates you and you feel fear and that the sender 
should be prosecuted under Section 471.1 of the Crimes Act (I think 
that's the section, the prior 85Ze)  :)