[LINK] The GGWS

[Fred Pilcher]

Rick Welykochy wrote:
> I stand corrected, Fred. My example above was simply an example of
> a falsehood, i.e. it was claimed there is no evidence that such and
> such is a consequence of CO2 or man's acitivities or whatever.

No intention whatsoever to criticise the argument or its validity, only
to react to a pet peeve. ;-)

> For those who might like to indulge in spotting logical fallacies
> in argument (it takes a diligent mind and real work!) try these two
> links:
> 
> The Atheism Web: Logic and Fallacies
> http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html
> 
> Fallacies of Logical Argument
> http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

Both superb sites. Recommendation seconded.

Fred