[LINK] E-mail question
Ivan Trundle
ivan at itrundle.com
Sat Jun 9 09:59:49 AEST 2007
Linkers
Some time ago, there was discussion about the use of "<" and ">" to
wrap weblink references in e-mail messages.
Can anyone enlighten me as to the usefulness/appropriateness/
standards applicability of wrapping web references this way, and if
it is still considered to be a Good Thing?
I've not found any RFC relating to the use of less-than/greater-than
symbols which purportedly permit long URLs to remain 'clickable' even
after being wrapped at the 80-character-plus mark.
For example, if I was to make a reference to a URL like this in a
plain text e-mail mesage:
http://www.tomw.net.au/icantbelieve/thatthisisgoingtowork/
butiminterested/tosee/index.html
...on its own it might suffer from being 'unclickable' if wrapped to
two lines. However, if it were wrapped like so:
<http://www.tomw.net.au/icantbelieve/thatthisisgoingtowork/
butiminterested/tosee/
index.html>
...then it purportedly avoids losing any characters of the URL even
if wrapped in a message to two lines (I've cut it deliberately).
LIght shedding on the matter, anyone?
--
Ivan Trundle
http://itrundle.com ivan at itrundle.com
ph: +61 (0)418 244 259 fx: +61 (0)2 6286 8742
skype: callto://ivanovitchk
More information about the Link
mailing list