[LINK] Apple's Not 'Bricking' Hacked IPhones for Revenge
Kim Holburn
kim at holburn.net
Thu Oct 4 18:32:08 AEST 2007
Interesting article. Who was it who said that the cause of many
things in this world is not deliberate actions but incompetence.
<http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/commentary/cultofmac/2007/10/
cultofmac_1003>
> The same is true of the iPhone, according to Jobs. "You don't want
> your phone to be like a PC," Jobs told The New York Times in
> January. "The last thing you want is to have loaded three apps on
> your phone and then you go to make a call and it doesn't work
> anymore. These are more like iPods than they are like computers."
>
> The iPhone bricking problem has been a PR disaster for Apple,
> making the company look punitive and obsessed with control. But
> Erica Sadun, a technical writer and blogger at TUAW.com who
> contributed to an iPhone unlocking application, said Apple's update
> wasn't designed to disable hacked devices. Just the opposite: Sadun
> thinks Apple worked hard not to brick iPhones -- even hacked ones.
>
> "It wasn't intentional at all," she said. "If they wanted to brick
> hacked iPhones, they could have done a much better job of it."
>
> Sadun said the software update disabled some hacked phones because
> it was a "troublesome update" -- it even caused problems with
> iPhones that hadn't been touched. "They messed up," she said.
>
> The new iPhone software appears to be a ground-up rewrite,
> unrecognizable under the hood to the older version, which Sadun
> said was "very unfinished" and, in some places, "a complete hack."
--
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3494957443
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link
mailing list