[LINK] Senate Standing Committee:
NetAlert/Mandatory filtering updates
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Tue Feb 19 16:56:50 EST 2008
At 04:22 PM 19/02/2008, Marghanita da Cruz wrote:
>The problem with the current approach is that it does not meet the
>needs...if a child can still see a gay site this may be unacceptable
>to some, if a child can see a site that talks about evolution than
>this might be unacceptable to some and if a child can still gamble
>and put their images on myspace and youtube then it may also be unacceptable.
I think different things are getting confused in all this, or maybe I
just don't get it or am putting my own filter on it. [pun intended]
Is the program to protect children from accessing nasties OR is it a
block from those who would access the kid pr0n, thereby reducing the
'benefit' to those who make the "$billions" each year from it? The
first is a parental overstep by the government. The second is a
moralistic restriction like is sometimes used in control of
prostitution -- arresting the johns, concentrating on reducing demand
and starving the sellers. Which is it?
Semi-finalist - Amazon Breakout Novelist Award 2008: The Truck - A
baby-boomer nostalgia murder mystery
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00121WDVA - Read and rate now!
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
Writing Lesson #289:
You have a million words of sh** to write, so do them in whatever way
makes it most rewarding for you and worry about wasted time later.
There is no wasted time except that spent not writing. - R Garcia,
Writing Lesson #54:
Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for
guests. - JW, May, 2007
_ __________________ _
More information about the Link