Reverse Gear [Was [LINK] Clarkson stung after bank prank]
Roger Clarke
Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au
Tue Jan 8 09:45:10 AEDT 2008
[This report appeared in the BBC's Entertainment section. It's very
much to be hoped that more thoughtful ones will appear under Business
and under Technology. Comments at end.]
Clarkson stung after bank prank
BBC News
Monday, 7 January 2008, 11:56 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7174760.stm
TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson has lost money after publishing his bank
details in his newspaper column.
The Top Gear host revealed his account numbers after rubbishing the
furore over the loss of 25 million people's personal details on two
computer discs.
He wanted to prove the story was a fuss about nothing.
But Clarkson admitted he was "wrong" after he discovered a reader had
used the details to create a £500 direct debit to the charity
Diabetes UK.
Clarkson published details of his Barclays account in the Sun
newspaper, including his account number and sort code. He even told
people how to find out his address.
"All you'll be able to do with them is put money into my account. Not
take it out. Honestly, I've never known such a palaver about
nothing," he told readers.
But he was proved wrong, as the 47-year-old wrote in his Sunday Times column.
"I opened my bank statement this morning to find out that someone has
set up a direct debit which automatically takes £500 from my
account," he said.
"The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data Protection
Act and they cannot stop it from happening again.
"I was wrong and I have been punished for my mistake."
Police were called in to search for the two discs, which contained
the entire database of child benefit claimants and apparently got
lost in the post in October 2007.
They were posted from HM Revenue and Customs offices in Tyne and
Wear, but never turned up at their destination - the National Audit
Office.
The loss, which led to an apology from Prime Minister Gordon Brown,
created fears of identity fraud.
Clarkson now says of the case: "Contrary to what I said at the time,
we must go after the idiots who lost the discs and stick cocktail
sticks in their eyes until they beg for mercy."
[COMMENTS:
1. "The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data
Protection Act ..."
That's one of the grossest BOTPAs of all time:
http://www.privacy.org.au/Resources/BOTPA.html
It's entirely false of course. Does a statute have standing to sue
for defamation?
2. "The bank ... cannot stop it from happening again"
2A. Implied: "The bank couldn't have stopped it from happening"
Unmitigated rubbish.
Before exercising a payment instruction that it receives, a bank
requires provision of some kind of authenticator.
Clarkson should ask his bank on what basis it determined that the
direct debit instruction was requested or authorised by the customer
(or by an approved agent for the customer).
There are then several possibilities, including:
- masquerade (e.g. forged signature)
- inadequate care by the customer (e.g. allowing capture of a PIN
or password to be
observed, or writing it down, or giving it to someone else, or
giving it to someone
else for one transaction and forgetting that it would enable more than one)
- error by the bank
- inadequate procedures by the bank
Clarkson has demonstrated himself many times to be an entertaining
idiot, so customer culpability can't be ruled out. But the facts as
reported don't support it, because there are many circumstances in
which bank account details need to be published (e.g. they're on
every invoice my company ever sends out). So publication of them in
a column doesn't even come close to being contributory negligence.
In short, the bank needs to be named, and pursued with vigour.
--
Roger Clarke http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 1472, and 6288 6916
mailto:Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au http://www.xamax.com.au/
Visiting Professor in Info Science & Eng Australian National University
Visiting Professor in the eCommerce Program University of Hong Kong
Visiting Professor in the Cyberspace Law & Policy Centre Uni of NSW
More information about the Link
mailing list