[LINK] CIA Admits Cyberattacks Blacked Out Cities
Richard Chirgwin
rchirgwin at ozemail.com.au
Tue Jan 22 09:48:06 AEDT 2008
Wow ... I love the gap between the scary headline and the very thin
detail in the CIA statement:
"We have information, from multiple regions outside the United States,
of cyber intrusions into utilities, followed by extortion demands. We
suspect, but cannot confirm, that some of these attackers had the
benefit of inside knowledge. We have information that cyberattacks have
been used to disrupt power equipment in several regions outside the
United States. In at least one case, the disruption caused a power
outage affecting multiple cities. We do not know who executed these
attacks or why, but all involved intrusions through the Internet."
Let's disassemble the statement:
> We have information, from multiple regions outside the United States,
> of cyber intrusions into utilities, followed by extortion demands.
..."information" is, in CIA-speak, a different creature to
"verification". It means "someone said something happened".
> We suspect, but cannot confirm, that some of these attackers had the
> benefit of inside knowledge.
Note the "cannot confirm"...
> We have information that cyberattacks have been used to disrupt power
> equipment in several regions outside the United States.
..."Information" again... remember that it was "information" that gave
the world WMD and Iraq.
> We do not know who executed these attacks or why, but all involved
> intrusions through the Internet.
There is one positive, unequivocal statement made in the whole thing:
"all involved intrusions through the Internet". In the absence of any
other fact, how in the world can that last statement be supported?
Of course, anybody who exposes a critical SCADA system to any
Internet-connected network, even indirectly, is a brain donor. But
scare-mongering like this is designed for the Information Week Google
hit-counter.
RC
David Boxall wrote:
> Here we go again.
>
> <http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=205901631&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All>
>
>
> " Citing two Government Accountability Office reports on SCADA
> security, Paller said that people have been adding wireless and
> Windows to SCADA systems without really thinking about security.
> "They're gotten radically unsafe," he said."
>
More information about the Link
mailing list