[LINK] Film industry takes on iiNet
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Fri Nov 21 10:27:15 AEDT 2008
At 10:13 AM 21/11/2008, Rick Welykochy wrote:
> > Ms Pecotic brushed aside Mr Malone's explanation, saying: "The law is
> > clear and iiNet knows that. They cannot pass the buck ... it is their
> > responsibility.
>The buck being passed is by the film industries. It is they're responsibility
>to enforce their copyright. Not data carriers. And certainly not our
>public infrastructure, i.e. law enforcement. I maintain that this is
>a tort, not a crime.
Interesting that I had a chat about this very thing with a friend in
Vic Police last night. Copyright is not a criminal offence, but a
civil offence that takes a plaintiff to file charge, not the police.
The police have no jurisdiction to do anything about this except in
the case of something like selling stolen goods, but that's even a stretch.
So Mike Malone was even wrong in sending the complaint to the police.
Neither party has it right. The only people who'll get anything out
of this challenge are the lawyers -- Again.
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
Writing Lesson #54:
Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for
guests. - JW, May, 2007
_ __________________ _
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.8/1801 - Release Date: 20/11/2008 9:11 AM
More information about the Link