[LINK] Australian ISPs offer US advice, smugness, on net neutrality
saliya at hinet.net.au
Wed Oct 1 15:31:38 EST 2008
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:58:02AM +1000, Ivan Trundle wrote:
> Is there an 'all you can eat' plan offered by any non-wholesale ISP in
> Australia these days?
It's called pay-per-MB; or volume-based charging, and is offered by
any ISP that offers plan + excess charges. Those ISPs don't limit
access (beyond what's required by the ACIF codes; and in some
notable cases not even that :) - since every byte earns them money,
it's in their interests to give you all you can eat.
I'm thinking you meant 'fixed-price' unlimited broadband service;
once again, the answer is 'yes'. Here are some ADSL-based examples:
256k/64k = $330/month
512k/128k = $550/month
1.5M/256k = $990/month
8M/384k = $2999/month
For some reason, they're not wildly popular. Who'd have thought?
Providers that sell unlimited services at cut-throat prices (e.g.
unlimited 256/64 ADSL for $20/month) _do not want_ customers that are going
to actually utilise what they appear to be offering.
So they keep clauses (often hidden) like "disconnect for overuse" or
"rate-limit P2P" or (my favourite) "disconnect for negative impact on us
or other users".
If we accept that at _some_ point there are shared resources, whether they
be DNS servers, or cross-connects, or peering points, or whatever - _every_
user has a negative impact on other users when they compete for those
shared resources... so all users of a service with this type of clause
could in theory be perfectly legally disconnected under that clause.
The 'limited-but-with-reasonable-limits' packages seem to be fairest for
everyone. Those limits change with time - 200MB was once an astronomical
amount of data per month, now it's 2/3 of the most recent Windows XP update.
More information about the Link