[LINK] Show me the money
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Wed Oct 29 09:40:40 EST 2008
At 09:22 AM 29/10/2008, grove at zeta.org.au wrote:
> If it ain't shrink wrapped and comes with a EULA,
>it's obviously not a product. Even our Directory Services project
>is under tender with the CAUDIT offering of Sun One IDM etc which is
> mostly free having to compete with products that cost $$$$$$ because
>of some stupid feature or another.
This concept of 'supported software' has always made me shake my
head. I can see it for major systems - e.g. financials, student
management, etc. - but not for desktops. There is some value in the
training sense, but I'm starting to wonder if that should be anywhere
close to a driving factor any more. By this stage in computer skills
development, we should be well past the 'need to train' argument in
most modern workplaces. People come with keyboard skills and word
processing and at least a passing acquaintance with spreadsheets if
they need it.
Seems to me the open approach to desktop has come. The concepts
should be embedded [all word processors have cut/copy/paste, for
example and require a unique filename to be saved]. So why not at
least take the step to allow for OS at that level? Is that happening?
The network and server software area is something I've not had to
make decisions about, so I'll leave that to you sysops folks.
[who is trying to use OO as much as possible now](waves at Brenda re
the $ and \n\n discovery. It's working fine.)
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
Writing Lesson #54:
Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for
guests. - JW, May, 2007
_ __________________ _
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1752 - Release Date: 28/10/2008 10:04 AM
More information about the Link