[LINK] The RFC process
stephen at melbpc.org.au
stephen at melbpc.org.au
Mon Apr 13 02:37:20 AEST 2009
Interesting rfc's (27) this fortnight maybe
http://tools.ietf.org/html/
Eg: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5514 (snip)
IPv6 over Social Networks
Abstract
There is a lack of IPv6 utilization in early 2009; this is partly
linked to the fact that the number of IPv6 nodes is rather low. This
document proposes to vastly increase the number of IPv6 hosts by
transforming all Social Networking platforms into IPv6 networks.
This will immediately add millions of IPv6 hosts to the existing IPv6
Internet. This document includes sections on addressing and
transport of IPv6 over a Social Network. A working prototype has
been developed.
1. Introduction
While the IPv6 protocols are well-known for years, not every host
uses IPv6 (at least in March 2009), and most network users are not
aware of what IPv6 is or are even afraid by IPv6 because it is
unknown.
On the other hand, Social Networks (like Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
are well-known by users and the usage of those networks is huge.
This document describes how to leverage Social Networks in order to
make more people aware of IPv6 and to add several thousands of IPv6
routers to the Internet.
2. Architecture
With IPv6 over Social Network (IPoSN):
o Every user is a router with at least one loopback interface;
o Every friend or connection between users will be used as a point-
to-point link.
On social networks users want to have multiple friends, partners, or
relations with other users. Therefore, it can be expected that there
is a heavily meshed network among these users. This will provide for
good IPv6 connectivity because each user (IPoSN router) will be IPv6
connected to all his/her friends (IPoSN neighbor routers).." (snip)
--
This RFC .. non-ASCII email addresses .. thinking about it how can the
net claim to be global, if it wants ASCII email headers? This net would
be ubiquitous if everyone with Chinese & Japanese (etc etc) ISP account
names, enjoy email with their own 'real' names? Seems a digital divide?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5504 (snip)
Traditional mail systems handle only ASCII characters in SMTP envelope
and mail header fields. The Email Address internationalization (UTF8SMTP)
extension allows UTF-8 characters in SMTP envelope & mail header fields.
To avoid rejecting internationalized email messages when a server in the
delivery path does not support the UTF8SMTP extension, some sort of
converting mechanism is required. This document describes ..." Otoh?
--
And, here's the Official 40th Year RFC, RFC Announcement :)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5540
Network Working Group RFC Editor
Request for Comments: 5540 USC/ISI
Category: Informational 7 April 2009
40 Years of RFCs
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This RFC marks the 40th anniversary of the RFC document series.
1. RFCs and Jon Postel
Forty years ago today, the first Request for Comments document, RFC
1, was published at UCLA [RFC1]. This was the first of a series that
currently contains more than 5400 documents (roughly 160,000 pages)
on computer networking in general and on the Internet protocols in
particular. The RFC series emerged from the US government-funded
research efforts that created the ARPANET and later the Internet.
When the IETF was formed in the mid-1980s, RFCs became the primary
publication vehicle for IETF standards, and thus became centered on
the vendor and user communities.
For the first 29 years, Jon Postel [Postel] was *the* RFC Editor,
until his untimely death in October 1998. Postel, with substantial
help from Joyce K. Reynolds, was responsible for the collection,
editing, online publication, and archiving of the RFC documents.
From 1978 until 1998, Postel was a research scientist at the USC
Information Sciences Institute (USC/ISI) in Marina del Rey,
California. Postel was also the original IANA as well as Director of
the Computer Networks Division at ISI.
Upon the occasion of the 30th anniversary of RFC 1 and as a tribute
to the massive contribution of Jon Postel, the RFC Editor published
RFC 2555 [RFC2555] on April 7, 1999. This RFC contained
recollections from three networking pioneers: Steve Crocker who wrote
RFC 1, Vint Cerf whose long-range vision continues to guide us, and
Jake Feinler who played a key role in the middle years of the RFC
series.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2555
Ten more years have now passed, and we have reached the 40th
anniversary of the RFC series. The series has more than doubled in
size during the last ten years, and it is expected to continue far
into the future. All the good things said in RFC 2555 still hold
true ten years later.
We should, however, note some changes that have occurred over the
past ten years.
o After Jon passed away, Joyce Reynolds and Bob Braden put together
a small organization at USC/ISI to continue the RFC Editor
function. This was motivated by a desire to honor Postel by
continuing his remarkable effort and to provide a service to the
Internet community.
o Funding of the RFC Editor, which had been supported by the US
government until 1998, was taken over by the Internet Society.
During 1998-2006, ISOC funded the RFC Editor under a series of
annual contracts and extensions. ISOC put the function out for
competitive bid for 2007 (USC/ISI was selected to provide RFC
Editor services from 2007-2009), and the contract will be put out
to bid again for post-2009.
During 2009 there will be a significant transition for the RFC
Editor function, as some new organization or set of organizations
takes over this service that has been performed at USC/ISI
continuously since 1978.
o Many improvements have increased the efficiency and transparency
of the RFC editorial process [RFCed09].
o The RFC Editor formed an RFC Editorial Board, a group of people
with broad and deep knowledge of the Internet and networking. One
of its major functions is to assist the RFC Editor by reviewing
RFCs in the Independent Submission stream.
o An email list, rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org, was created to obtain
community input on the RFC Editor functions.
RFC Editor Informational [Page 2]
RFC 5540 40th Anniversary 7 April 2009
2. Security Considerations
This document does not raise any security issues.
3. Acknowledgments
It has been an honor for USC/ISI to serve the community during the
past 31 years.
4. Informative References
[Postel] "Remembering Jonathan B. Postel",
<http://www.postel.org/remembrances/>.
[RFCed09] Braden, R., Ginoza, S., and A. Hagens, "The RFC Editor
Function at ISI", <http://www.rfc-editor.org/
RFCeditor.at.ISI.pdf>, January 2009.
[RFC1] Crocker, S., "Host Software", RFC 1, April 1969.
[RFC2555] RFC Editor, et al., "30 Years of RFCs", RFC 2555, April
1999.
Author's Address
RFC Editor
--
> > * How the Internet Got Its Rules
> >
> > By S.D. CROCKER Published: April 7, 2009
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07crocker.html?ref=internet
> >
> > First Request for Comment: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1
> >
> >
> > TODAY is an important date in the history of the Internet: the 40th
> > anniversary of what is known as the "Request for Comments".
Cheers,
Stephen
Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server
More information about the Link
mailing list