[LINK] Explaining an online course online
Tom Worthington
Tom.Worthington at tomw.net.au
Sat Apr 25 12:23:37 AEST 2009
The Australian National University is now promoting my "Green ICT
Strategies" course (COMP7310)
<http://cs.anu.edu.au/students/comp7310/. While the ANU has a
sophisticated system for delivering flexible web based e-learning
courses blended with face-to-face education, the marketing and
administrative systems are still catching up with the Internet age.
At times it has seemed that writing the course has been the easy bit
and the hard part is navigating the convoluted, paper orientated
administrative systems.
The university has provided:
1. Official course description in the online handbook:
<http://studyat.anu.edu.au/courses/COMP7310;details.html>.
2. Course flyer: <http://cs.anu.edu.au/students/comp7310/flyer.html>
3. General information page: <http://cs.anu.edu.au/students/comp7310/>
4. Enrollment information page:
<http://cs.anu.edu.au/students/comp7310/enrol.html>
5. Online independent registration form:
<http://onestop.anu.edu.au/cfrstep1.cgi?TRAN-NO=200&EVENT=COMP7310&SEATS=1&VOUCHER=&ATTENDEE=>
It is not clear to me what the role of all these different web pages
are and how, or if they relate to each other. But at least
independent students (just doing this one course) can register online
via the web. This is appropriate for a course which can be done
online from anywhere (with an Internet connection).
The course flyer was originally in PDF, in two versions: high
resolution for print and low resolution for the web. I asked for a
HTML version, but then had to convince the marketing staff that this
was within the policies of the university. The problem seemed to be
that the marketing approach was based on the idea that someone from
the university went to an event and handed out paper brochures. The
idea that potential students would be attracted to the university web
site and get the information on their own did not seem to fit with
this model, even though the ANU web site has existed for some years.
After some discussion the HTML brochure was created but it is very
much an orphan, not connected to anywhere else on the web site, apart
from one link on the bottom. The reasoning behind this seems to be
that a paper brochure can't have web link and therefore a HTML one
can't either.
Then I suggested the web pages should be smart phone friendly, which
caused some head scratching by the staff. All web pages must conform
to the ANU corporate standard and this did not allow for mobile
devices. So I pointed out that a mobile web site would be what the
trendy young iPhone demographic would want and proposed the
university policy and corporate web standards be changed to
accommodate this. This caused much excitement in the marketing area
and they particularly like the W3C Mobile OK test, which gave the
non-web design literate staff an easy way to measure web design.
However, the initial response was to create a separate mobile extra
web page. We then had four versions of the brochure: high PDF, low
PDF, web and mobile web. This was not what I had in mind, although it
would make sense if the demographics of the people using mobile web
sites differed from those using regular ones. The extra one for
phones has now been merged with the regular web page.
There appear to be five different ways that someone can enroll in the
one course: ungraded, graded, Masters of Computing, Information
Technology, or Graduate Studies. The first two are so subtle in
difference that I still have difficulty understanding it and I doubt
that many of the potential students would. There are three different
ways to enroll: two different web forms for the ungraded and Masters
and PDF to print forms for the graded. It seems a little odd that you
don't just enroll in the one course the one way.
The "ungraded certificate" is the simplest process: just fill in your
name and contact details and provided a credit card number:
<http://onestop.anu.edu.au/cfrstep1.cgi?TRAN-NO=200&EVENT=COMP7310&SEATS=1&VOUCHER=&ATTENDEE=>.
Students wanting to do the course as part of a Master of Information
Technology Studies can apply using an online form:
<http://student.anu.apply.studylink.com/apply.cfm?subc=7704XMITS&title=Master+of+Information+Technology+Studies>.
Those adding it to studies at another university, have to navigate a
list of different PDF forms, print out the appropriate form, fill it
out on paper and mail it back. One frustration of this process is
that first you have to navigate your way through a complex table to
select the appropriate form to use
<http://www.anu.edu.au/sas/admission/#localNAWD>. You then discover
that the PDF form you downloaded is a general purpose one (which you
would have got by selecting any of several of the cells in the
previous table) and you have to navigate your way through the same
choices in the form after having printed it out.
The university system (not just ANU) has a whole lot of categories
which do not seem very relevant for a blended, flexible, web based
course. There is a distinction between on and off campus courses, a
difference for Australian and overseas enrollments and between those
people doing a postgraduate course at the ANU, at another university
or not doing it as part of any course. No doubt all this is relevant
to the institutional administration; it may effect how much money the
university gets or a particular part of the university gets, but does
not seem relevant to the student or the actual course.
It would seem to make more sense to have the enrollment process from
the point of view of the student and for their convenience: the
student would say "I want to do this" and the university system would
work out how to do that, what it costs and who gets paid what.
It doesn't matter where in the world the students are, at which
institution they are enrolled (or none), the actual course will be
the same. If they happen to be near the campus and feel the need,
they can come to an optional seminar, or not. If they are not near
the campus, or do not feel the need for a particular part of the
course, they need not attend in person. This is what of think of as a
"flexible" course, not one where the student has to decide months in
advance if they will be in a particular place every week at a
specific day at a specific time.
It might be simplest if universities (and other educators) thought of
their courses as being distance education "plus". That is the
administrative processes for the course can be provided online and as
much of the course as makes sense. Then deal with the complexities of
the bits which need to be synchronised in time, but not place (by web
conference for examples), then the parts which need to be at a place
but not a particular time (such as having to visit some sort of
specially equipped lab) and the parts of the course which must be in
the same place at the same time. Current university processes assume
that "same place, same time" is usual and the other modes are the
exception, but this could be reversed, making it much easier for the
student. This could also simplify the university administration and
lower costs.
Obviously this approach would have implications for the way
universities are run and charge for their services. If you don't know
how many students are going to turn up on any particular day, then
how will you know how many staff to allocate or how big a room to
book? In practice it is likely that a predictable pattern would
emerge (I know fewer students will turn up on Mondays and Fridays).
Some institutions might run face-to-face classes like budget airline
flights: with bookings and incentives for standbys. Some teachers
fear that if classes are not compulsory, then no students will ever
turn up, but I doubt it and in any case it is not a worry as long as
the learning happens.
Tom Worthington FACS HLM tom.worthington at tomw.net.au Ph: 0419 496150
Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 309
PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617 http://www.tomw.net.au/
Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Australian National University
More information about the Link
mailing list