[LINK] Australian Data ARK
David Lochrin
dlochrin at d2.net.au
Thu Feb 12 10:18:47 AEDT 2009
On Thursday 12 February 2009 02:11, Tom Koltai wrote:
> I suggest that the establishment of the datacentre should possibly be a
> joint Fujitsu/EDI/IBM with a Google frontend national database centre,
>
> The datacentre would by design be split into four distinct locations.
> One IBM, One Fijitsu, One EDI and one Google.
>
> Both Fujitsu and IBM would be required to submit to the specifications
> of Google (as the front end) and EDI as the backend. [...]
I haven't read the original request for comments. But is such a level of business focus, naming specific companies, really appropriate? In any case, I think the Government & Public Service would have its' own ideas about a proper commercial / strategic solution.
Did you say anything about use of public-domain standards, or do you propose to leave all that to Google etc?
But the biggest question is ~why~ do it this way? I'd have thought government is more interested in principles.
David
More information about the Link
mailing list