[LINK] clean coal
David Boxall
david.boxall at hunterlink.net.au
Tue Feb 24 09:52:51 AEDT 2009
At Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:52:25 GMT stephen at melbpc.org.au wrote:
> Sunday, February 22, 2009
>
> Ritter, fellow governors ask Obama to support 'clean coal' technologies
> Denver Business Journal
>
> http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2009/02/16/daily69.html
> ...
In post-combustion technologies, the challenge is in capturing the
carbon dioxide. As I understand it, the sheer volume of flue gases
defeats current technologies. The best I've seen catches only 2% of the
CO2.
The publicity speaks grandly of (as I remember) 84% reductions but they
seem always to concentrate on storage, ignoring capture. Account for
the energy cost of capture and storage and 'clean coal' starts to look
very dirty indeed.
--
David Boxall | ignorance more frequently
| begets confidence than does
| knowledge
|--Charles Darwin (introduction
| to 'The Descent of Man' 1871)
More information about the Link
mailing list