[LINK] ACMA Internet Filter List Leaked

[Jan Whitaker]

At 11:06 AM 20/03/2009, Paul Brooks wrote:
>I'm sure there is a continuous spectrum of degree of 'abhorence'
>(completely ignoring how this is subjective to the viewer), and it seems
>to me that the worse the material is, the less likely it is to be found
>on a publicly accessable site, especially one with an obvious name.

I wonder if it's a matter of bait and switch, or a come-on to get a 
taste, then entice the stupid into accessing the 'really "good" 
stuff'. I get lots of the typical spam crap advertising this junk and 
delete it without reading. But it wouldn't surprise me that, like the 
'contests' from the 'premium' mobile services, they are ways to get 
people 'hooked'.

If the govt thinks they'll stop the 'really "good" stuff' by blocking 
websites, they're daft, just like their censorship policy. Too much 
money in it.

Jan



Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
business: http://www.janwhitaker.com

Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or 
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer

_ __________________ _