[LINK] High Bandwidth for Australia

Bernard Robertson-Dunn brd at iimetro.com.au
Fri May 8 10:02:56 EST 2009


Ivan Trundle wrote:
> On 08/05/2009, at 9:06 AM, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
>
>   
>> Can someone post something about the content, preferably a summary and
>> analysis. I'm not interested in all the gory details of what everybody
>> said, but I am interested to find out if anything meaningful was
>> achieved - other than the use of technology.
>>     
>
> I'm in the same boat as Bernard: unable to attend or even focus on the  
> event, yet desperately seeking to know what actually happened and what  
> was said...
>   
To expand. I assume the process is something like this:

1 Data/opinion/information gathering
2 Analysis
3 Formulation of position and/or conclusions
4 Communicate/publish position and/or conclusions

So far we've had some or all of 1. I'm just as much, if not more, 
interested in 3->4. I'd like to know that the info gathered from step 1 
has been "properly" represented in the later stages.

It's called transparency and evidence based policy development.

And relating the later steps to current technology crazes, I can't see 
much of a role for twitter type communications. IMHO, these steps 
require reflection and contemplation rather than instant decision making.

Does anyone do reflection and contemplation any more?

-- 
 
Regards
brd

Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Canberra Australia
brd at iimetro.com.au



More information about the Link mailing list