[LINK] Tweeting @reply
stil at stilgherrian.com
Fri May 15 09:40:46 EST 2009
I should point out that the backlash Twitter received for changing the
behaviour without asking was immense, an it was reverted within hours.
On 15/05/2009, at 8:34 AM, Jan Whitaker wrote:
> Sounds quite a bit like cyberstalking to me. Or Peeping Toms. [no
> offence to those named Tom]
Not at all. Anyone wanting to make their message private just has to
use a direct message (DM) instead of a public @reply.
Replying to someone in public is one of the most important reasons for
Twitter's success. "Naked Conversations", to use the title of Shel
Israel and Robert Scoble's book (which I haven't read). I'm tagging a
tweet with someone's name to draw it to their attention, but making it
public so if anyone else find the information useful, there it is.
If I say, for example...
@alice That amazing contemporary gallery in Hamburg is http://example.de
... then someone like @eve, who's following me but neither @alice nor
@bob, not only discovers something which satisfies her own interest in
modern art but also potentially finds to new friends with similar
Remember, everyone in this scenario has *already* decided to
participate in the naked conversation.
What Twitter's change meant was that @eve would not see that tweet,
even though I had chosen to make it public. An important source of
serendipitous connections was removed. As I say, though,it has now
Internet, IT and Media Consulting, Sydney, Australia
mobile +61 407 623 600
fax +61 2 9516 5630
ABN 25 231 641 421
More information about the Link