[LINK] Microsoft controlling Govt 2.0 funds
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
brd at iimetro.com.au
Fri Oct 2 12:46:38 AEST 2009
Microsoft controlling Govt 2.0 funds
By Chris Duckett
ZDNet.com.au
01 October 2009 05:33 PM
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Microsoft-controlling-Govt-2-0-funds/0,130061733,339298859,00.htm
The Government 2.0 Taskforce yesterday released a draft contract for
those receiving money from its Project Fund, which revealed that any
funding contracts will be between successful bidders and Microsoft, not
the Commonwealth.
The Project Fund was used by the Taskforce to fund initiatives that will
provide input into its final report and building up government agency
"web 2.0 capabilities". The Taskforce has already asked for two rounds
of project submissions.
Yet the government has only now revealed that the funding arrangements
must be made via Microsoft. It needed to be so because the taskforce was
not a legal entity and money was pulled from the Project Fund, according
to the government — a partnership with Microsoft that used funds from a
special Service Provision Fund.
The Taskforce has said on its website that despite Microsoft managing
the purse strings of the Project Fund, it will not have a part deciding
which projects are funded. However, the blog post where the announcement
about the contracts was made yesterday has drawn considerable
discussion, particularly on the issue of intellectual property (IP).
Microsoft Australia's head of government and industry affairs, Simon
Edwards, looked to quiet some of the IP concerns by posting in
Microsoft's Australian Government Affairs blog. "If a contractor creates
IP it will have agreed (in its contract with Microsoft) to assign or
licence that IP to the Commonwealth. Microsoft does not share the IP.
Microsoft does not own the IP. Microsoft has no rights to the IP,"
Edwards wrote.
Concerns were also expressed over clauses of the contract draft which
may allow Microsoft to replace an employee with an employee approved by
Microsoft, or require employees to undertake compulsory training.
Edwards said that Microsoft was happy to look at suggestions to the
contract as long as Microsoft's integrity and risk exposure was maintained.
--
Regards
brd
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Canberra Australia
brd at iimetro.com.au
More information about the Link
mailing list