[LINK] Tax to save journalism?
stephen at melbpc.org.au
stephen at melbpc.org.au
Wed Jun 9 21:24:10 AEST 2010
Survey Suggests Majority Oppose Taxes to Save Journalism
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
<http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/06/08/survey-suggests-majority-
oppose-taxes-to-save-journalism>
The US Federal Trade Commission is considering whether or not it can step
in and save journalism.
A "staff discussion" document from the FTC proposes some ideas
for "Potential Policy Recommendations to Support the Reinvention of
Journalism" ..
http://www.ftc.gov/opp/workshops/news/jun15/docs/new-staff-discussion.pdf
Among the ideas in the document are various taxes.
For example, a 5% tax on consumer electronics is mentioned. The document
suggests this would generate about $4 billion annually. An ISP-cell phone
tax is also mentioned, which the document says would generate $6 billion
annually.
Rasmussen Reports surveyed 1,000 adults about such taxes. Here are some
of the results they are reporting:
<http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/
june_2010/74_oppose_taxing_internet_news_sites_to_help_newspapers>
- 84% oppose a 3% tax on monthly cell phone bills to help newspapers and
traditional journalism. 10% favor it.
- 76% oppose a proposed 5% tax on the purchase of consumer electronic
items such as computers, iPads and Kindles to help support newspapers and
traditional journalism. 16% support it.
- 74% oppose the proposal to tax web sites like the Drudge Report to help
the newspapers they draw their headlines from. 18% of Adults favor
placing an additional tax on Internet news sites.
- 71% oppose the creation of a taxpayer-funded program that would hire
and pay young reporters to work for newspapers around the country. 14%
support such a program, while 15% are undecided.
- 58% of Americans are confident that online and other news sources will
make up the difference if many newspapers go out [of] business.
It's important to note that at the beginning of the document, it
says, "This draft does not represent final conclusions or recommendations
by the Commission or FTC staff; it is solely for purposes of discussion,"
but still, these are potential policy recommendations.
--
Cheers,
Stephen
More information about the Link
mailing list