[LINK] A Canadian author's perspective on "radical extremism" and copyright
Kim Holburn
kim at holburn.net
Fri Jun 25 09:55:03 AEST 2010
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/23/a-canadian-authors-p.html
> Cory Doctorow at 10:33 AM Wednesday, Jun 23, 2010
>
> As the Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore has declared war
>
> <http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/23/canadian-heritage-mi-2.html>
> on copyright reformers who object to his plan to bring US-style
> "digital locks" rules to Canada, I think it's worth spelling out
> what my objections, as a Canadian author, are to his plan (my books
> are distributed across Canada by the excellent HB Fenn; last year I
> won the Ontario White Pine Award for best book; as I write this, my
> novel For the Win is on the Canadian bestseller lists).
>
> Minister Moore has proposed a law that would give near-absolute
> protection to "digital locks" that control use, access and copying
> of works stored on a computer, mobile device, set-top box, etc. This
> is nearly the same policy that the US has had since 1998, when it
> brought down the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (actually, the
> American version is slightly better, since they've built in a
> regular review of the policy). In the intervening 12 years, we've
> learned two things about digital locks:
> 1. They don't work. Even the most sophisticated digital locks are
> usually broken in a matter of hours or days. And where they're not
> broken, it's mainly because you can get the same works by another
> means -- rather than breaking the iTunes lock, you break the easier
> Zune lock (or vice-versa), because you can get the same songs either
> way.
>
> So digital locks don't stop piracy. All they do is weaken the case
> for buying music, movies and books instead of ripping them off --
> after all, no one woke up this morning wishing there was a way to do
> less with her music. So how could adding a digital lock make a paid
> product more attractive than the free version?
>
> 2. They transfer power to technology firms at the expense of
> copyright holders. The proposed Canadian rules on digital locks
> mirror the US version in that they ban breaking a digital lock for
> virtually any reason. So even if you're trying to do something legal
> (say, ripping a CD to put it on your MP3 player), you're still on
> the wrong side of the law if you break a digital lock to do it.
>
> Here's what that means for creators: if Apple, or Microsoft, or
> Google, or TiVo, or any other tech company happens to sell my works
> with a digital lock, only they can give you permission to take the
> digital lock off. The person who created the work and the company
> that published it have no say in the matter.
>
> So if you buy $1,000 worth of digitally locked books for your Kindle
> or iPad, the author and the publisher can't give you the right to
> move those to another device. That means that not only are you
> locked into the Kindle -- so is the copyright holder. Authors and
> publishers who decide to stop selling via a digitally locked
> platform have to take the risk that their readers will abandon their
> investment in proprietary books in order to follow them to the next
> device.
>
> So that's Minister Moore's version of "author's rights" -- any tech
> company that happens to load my books on their device or in their
> software ends up usurping my copyrights. I may have written the
> book, sweated over it, poured my heart into it -- but all my rights
> are as nothing alongside the rights that Apple, Microsoft, Sony and
> the other DRM tech-giants get merely by assembling some electronics
> in a Chinese sweatshop.
>
--
Kim Holburn
The Pinchgut Press
http://www.pinchgut-press.com.au
T: +61 2 61402408 M: +61 404072753
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
More information about the Link
mailing list