[LINK] Points, lines & curves
Jan Whitaker
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Sun Feb 13 10:55:05 AEDT 2011
At 09:30 AM 13/02/2011, David Boxall wrote:
>In the NBN debate, it seems to me that curve people are the ones who see
>the logic - and ultimate economy - in fibre.
>
>There are lessons here on our understanding of human population, water,
>air & soil degradation and global warming, but they're debates for other
>fora.
Interesting description of worldview. It somewhat equates to people
who understand dimensional data representation: linear, matrix and
database. I can do the first two quite easily (think a flat file
document versus a spreadsheet). Where I lose confidence is with
relational databases.
But I did get the answer to the exponential problem because I worked
the logic backwards. That's fine for analysis after the fact. You
know the result: the rats filled the room at a particular time. (What
wasn't said was that was the exact time that the room filled and
there was an absolute filling and rats don't squash, because if they
did, the filling could have happened before the 1pm time given.) But
in the real world, we don't know the end point of that filling. So
then the whole thing falls into a risk management and diversification
of investment space.
We've had a bit of exploration on link about the value of redundancy,
a type of diversification (of access/service). We didn't have much
redundancy before the mobile network, but now it's expected. So do we
pull out the alternative connections? (copper and wifi in areas that
can use fibre) Is it economically justifiable to maintain? Do you
mothball these so there is a backstop?
Aggregation is another aspect of this: if you put all the comms on
the fibre to a particular house (I'm not talking about the range of
install for the particular range of houses by using wireless and
satellite), and that single connection goes out, you lose the
channels of communication. If TV goes to all-wired in the future,
shut down the open broadcast towers, or radio goes all online instead
of open airwaves because those frequencies can be better used for
something else, then we are at risk.
Phasing out (exponentially?? ;-) ) is another consideration in the system.
Jan
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
_ __________________ _
More information about the Link
mailing list