[LINK] Mobile 'phone network efficiencies [Was: Broadband for a Broad Land]
David Boxall
david.boxall at hunterlink.net.au
Tue Jan 4 21:12:57 AEDT 2011
Getting off the original topic, hence the change in subject line.
On 4/01/2011 11:15 AM, Jan Whitaker wrote:
> At 10:11 AM 4/01/2011, David Boxall wrote:
>> So why didn't the government of the day choose a better way? It seems to
>> me that a single coordinated mobile 'phone network, making optimum use
>> of available spectrum, would serve us best. Was it lack of imagination
>> or lack of talent? Or did they just want the money from selling
>> spectrum, so they could buy our votes?
>
> I doubt the spectrum use would have reduced because the volume of use
> would have eventually required expansion. ...
If all available spectrum was in a single network, couldn't it be more
efficiently managed than it is under the current fragmentation? As it
stands, we have overlapping coverage in some markets and none in others.
The same thing happened with cable TV; it seems to be a fundamental flaw
in market economics that markets perceived as lucrative will be
over-serviced, to the detriment of others.
> ... What it did waste was tower
> duplication. I'm not a network engineer by any stretch of the
> imagination, but I'd bet that like the cable tv roll-out, there could
> have been a reduction in infrastructure build. Then again, redundancy
> isn't always a bad thing either. ...
Looking at forests of mobile 'phone towers on roadside hilltops, I
wonder whether there's really effective redundancy. One storm will wipe
out the lot (in a given location).
> ... if there were only one
> commercial mobile network, the competition thing comes into play.
>
And if it was one (publicly owned) wholesale provider, with multiple
retail competitors? Think NBN model, but for mobile 'phones (leaving
out, for the moment, the crazy notion that the NBN be flogged off at the
end of the current project).
> There are those that think a government held monopoly is just as bad
> as a commercial one. I'm not sure. ...
Government enterprises tend to fail through ineptitude, commercial ones
through mendacity. We can at least punish the government at the ballot
box. The law has degenerated to a point that we have little defence
against commerce (James Hardie, anyone?).
--
David Boxall | The more that wise people learn
| The more they come to appreciate
http://david.boxall.id.au | How much they don't know.
--Confucius
More information about the Link
mailing list